iisus a fost crucificat la constantinopole si nu la ierusalim - partea iii

7/23/2019 Iisus a Fost Crucificat La Constantinopole Si Nu La Ierusalim - Partea III

1/49

TOPIC: Iisus Christos a fost crucificat la Constantinopole si

nu la Ierusalim

Re: Iisus Christos a fost crucificat la Constantinopole si nula Ierusalim 06 Feb 2015 09:52 !!"

Conform cronologiei oficiale, Evanghelia dupa Marcu a fost scrisa injurul anului 67 (dupa altii, in intervalul 50-75), iar ultima, cea dupaoan!

"upa alte pareri, ultima evanghelie reali#ata ar fi cea dupa Matei ($5-%%0)!

Euse&ius' apias spune ca a au#it!!!din gura &atranului oan!!!caMarcu a devenit interpretul lui etru si a scris cu e*actitate tot ce-siamintea etru!

"ar Marcu era si ruda apropiata a lui +arna&a, insotitorul lui avel incalatorii' influenta lui avel in mai multe etape ale ela&orariidocumentului care a stat la &a#a redactarii Evangheliei dupa Marcueste &inecunoscuta cercetatorilor!

i se spune ca Evanghelia dupa oan a starnit opo#itia unor e*ponentide seama ai crestinismului timpuriu (apias, +asilides, ustinus)!

evitic ./'7

n the first da1 that 1ou hold the sacred assem&l1, 1ou are to do noservile 2or3!

&i&lehu&!com4leviticus4./-7!htm

umeri .$'%$

n #iua dinti, s fie o adunare sfnt' s nu face8i nici o lucrare deslug 9n ea!

&i&lehu&!com4num&ers4.$-%$!htm

"haranis

: E

;enior +oarder

osts'


2/49

Cum este posi&il ca etru sa-i fi oferit lui Marcu informatii catastrofalde gresite, iar acestea sa fi fost acceptate timp de secole de catre toticrestinii=

Cum este posi&il ca oan sa nu fi cunoscut continutul te*telorevangheliilor sinoptice si astfel sa indice contradictia inimagina&ilapre#enta in acestea=

Cum se face ca nici unul dintre carturarii4calugarii pre#enti la ;inodulde la iceea nu au o&servat greseala monumentala, evidenta, dinEvanghelii=

Cum sa fi acceptat crestinii sa moara in chinuri cumplite, pe areneleromane, avand in vedere chestiunea incalcarii poruncilor din

>orah4?echiul >estament de catre apostoli=Cum e posi&il ca uther sa nu fi o&servat aceste discrepante,catastrofale pentru religia crestina=

atriarhul "aniel, comentand oul >estament'

&inevestitorul!2ordpress!com4.0%


3/49

umai ca orice lucrare de sluga in prima #i de @#imi (descrisa incapitolul %/ din Ev! dupa oan) era >ED;@ ?ECFB>E;>@ME>!

umeri .$,%$

umeri .$'%$ n #iua dinti, s fie o adunare sfnt' s nu face8i nici olucrare de slug 9n ea!

Evanghelia lui oan

%/,%! ar 9nainte de sr&toarea aAtilor, Atiind isus c a sosit ceasului, ca s treac din lumea aceasta la >atl, iu&ind pe ai ;i cei dinlume, pn la sfrAit i-a iu&it!

n acelasi capitol, si discutia despre uda si tradarea sa!!!

"eci Evangheliile dupa Matei, Marcu si uca ne spun ca ultima cina(cea de taina) a avut loc in #iua dintai a pra#nicului @#imilor pe %estament include mai multe versiuni, create de grupuri deinterese care fiecare si-au introdus propriile idei4concepte!

;i atunci, atriarhul "aniel ne indeamna (la fel ca si toti ceilalatiprelati catolici4ortodocsi) de fapt sa fim pasi&ili de pedeapsa cumoartea' incalcarea poruncilor (in special in prima #i de @#imi)astelui udaic inseamna pedeapsa capitala - cum e posi&il sa nu vadasau sa-si dea seama de faptul ca >he ast ;upper, Cina cea de >aina,asa cum este descrisa in cele trei evanghelii sinoptice, incalca grav siimediat poruncile clare din umeri si evitic=


4/49

222!dacia!org4daciarevival4forum4estament)

Mai mult, inventarea4ela&orarea Evangheliilor a avut loc in perioada%775-%7H0 e!n!, fiindca doar cateva decenii mai tar#iu apar primele

critici severe la adresa te*tului propriu-#is' acestea lipsesc cudesavarsire inainte de secolul II!

Ed2in Johnson, folosind o a&ordare diferita, a descoperit ca asanumitii arinti ai +isericii F@+@D B @?E@B de continutulepistolei catre Domani, atri&uita lui avel'

222!egodeath!com4ed2injohnsonpaulineepistles!htmGK>oc5


5/49

in attempting to force these etters upon the 2orld! >here must have&een a sufficient num&er of men of true learning and taste during the@ge of u&lication, 2ho 2ere a2are that these etters 2ere notgenuine, and that the Church s1stem 2as of recent origin!

>he1 2ere pro&a&l1 strong enough to ma3e their tacit resistance felt!+ut the mon3s had organisation of a 3ind 2hich honest men cannothaveQ and organisation triumphed! +1 this long and &e2ilderingdeclamation a&out heretics, 2ho had raised ever1 o&jection, and had&een full1 refuted, the1 ans2er the adversaries of their o2n timeQ anda great advertisement has &een given to a s1stem of &oo3s, in 2hichall parties are induced to see3, and all to find, their o2n peculiardogmas! n course of time all opposition is silenced &1 the deafeningclamour of these +i&lical men! >he1 are suffered to have their o2n2a1Q and the defeated 2orld has at last &een co2ed into the &elief thatthere must &e some great &asis of fact, as the1 sa1, &eneath all these

tales a&out aul, his elders, his disciples, his troops of friends and offoes!

;tiind ca arhitectura este cea mai puternica forma de a influentaopinia pu&lica, si avand la dispo#itie tehnologia care nu eradisponi&ila restului populatiei, acesti falsificatori au construit primelecatedrale in Europa (Lranta, Permania, Elvetia, @nglia, ;pania, talia)in timp ce modificau de #or te*tele care urmau sa devina +i&lia!

(pentru mai multe detalii ve#i paginile % si . ale acestui sir de discutii)

ast Edit' 07 Le& .0%5 06'00 &1 "haranis! Deport to moderatorRuic3 Depl1Depl1RuoteEdit

Re: Iisus Christos a fost crucificat la Constantinopole si nu

la Ierusalim 06 Feb 2015 10:"" !!5

E*ista o mare nedumerire printre arheologii4istoricii romani, legatade mai multe detalii care au fost descoperite la Cucuteni (datareaoficiala cam 5500 i!e!n!)' nu numai pigmentii utili#ati in ceramica,dar si sim&olurile solare ale unor anumite artefacte!

@celeasi sim&oluri solare au fost evidentiate de catre astronomul "!lenici in architectura caselor din +ucovina'

adevaruldespredaci!ro4sen#ational-motive!!!rtaria-galerie-foto4

Cum este posi&il ca autorul acestui te*t (lin3ul de mai sus) sa nu isi

"haranis

: E
http://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/334-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/reporthttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/334-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=replyhttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/334-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=replyhttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/334-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=quotehttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/334-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=edithttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/301-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim?limit=10&start=20#335http://adevaruldespredaci.ro/senzational-motive-astronomice-in-arhitectura-traditionala-romaneasca-similare-semnelor-de-pe-tablitele-de-la-tartaria-galerie-foto/http://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/profilehttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/334-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/reporthttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/334-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=replyhttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/334-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=replyhttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/334-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=quotehttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/334-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=edithttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/301-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim?limit=10&start=20#335http://adevaruldespredaci.ro/senzational-motive-astronomice-in-arhitectura-traditionala-romaneasca-similare-semnelor-de-pe-tablitele-de-la-tartaria-galerie-foto/http://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/profile


6/49

dea seama ca aceste sim&oluri apartin "E L@> aceleiasi epociistorice= ;i ca reali#area acestor motive solare a fost efectuata intr-uninterval foarte mic de timp, mai putin de .00 de ani, si nu de milenii=

@celasi autor pre#inta sim&olul &ourului moldovenesc evidentiat inmai multe etape4epoci ale istoriei' Cucuteni, mormantul atri&uit lui"romihete, si &ineinteles epoca apartinand lui ;tefan cel Mare' innoua cronologie radicala a istoriei, aceste epoci sunt e*trem deapropriate unele de altele (ve#i dove#ile pre#entate pana acumcititorilor)!

Cel putin in ca#ul manastirii utna, arheologii romani si-au dat seamaca ;tema Moldovei nu a fost deloc conceputa si reali#ata in %

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%6E celelalte metode utili#ate indatarea artefactelor istorice' de#integrarea uraniului4toriului, potasiu-argon, ru&idiu-strontiu, dendrocronologie, spectroscopie, ice coredating, ve#i si2e&!archive!org42e&4.00$%..$%$.65%4http'!!!o4pagini4cs4csH!html-o mica introducere in lim&a romana)

>ot acolo am adaugat si o sinte#a despre ;PBD@ metoda carepoate fi utili#ata' dispersarea materiei din coada unei comete,material &i&liografic e*ceptional, inclusiv lucrarea lui "r! S!?she3hsviats31 in care demonstrea#a ca Falle1Ts comet nu ar fi pututsa or&ite#e sistemul solar mai mult de H000 de ani!

ucrarile de &a#a care e*plica greselile inimagina&ile, colosale,monumentale, de#astruoase din datarea radiometrica'

;enior +oarder

osts'


7/49

Fistor1' Liction or ;cience= volume '

&oo3s!google!ro4&oo3s=idNcjL@?222!cs!unc!edu4Uplaisted4ce4dating!html (super& documentation)

222!ridgecrest!ca!us4UdoK2hile4sage4v$iHf!htm

itotd!com4articles4/


8/49

Collapsing >ests of >ime'

gra#ian-archive!com4Vuantavolution4volK0/4chaosKcreationK0/!htm

arado*ul ;oarelui >impuriu' una dintre cele mai devastatoaredove#i care ne arata erorile colosale din datarea geologica oficiala'

222!davidic3e!com4forum4sho2thread!php=t.$.%$$ (am inclustoate detaliile necesare pentru o cunoastere de e*ceptie a acestuiparado* formida&il din astrofi#ica4cosmologie)

e scurt, o descriere' deoarece orice variatie a lumino#itatii ;oarelui

ar fi avut efecte de#astruoase asupra evolutiei vietii pe amant, adicatemperaturi mult mai sca#ute (ceea ce ar contra#ice, &ineinteles,teoria conform careia amantul a cunoscut o temperatura medie inultimii


9/49

Earth scientists have come to accept that an asteroid impact directl1or indirectl1 did for the dinosaurs and other species 65 million 1earsago, if onl1 &ecause the1Yve &een &eaten into su&mission &1 theendless &arrage of propaganda in its favour! @nd the 2ord thatYs &eenin their ears constantl1 for the past fe2 1ears is ZChic*ulu&[ X +ut

2ait\hear the other side first XY

:h1 the Chic*ulu&-impact 2as an e*plosive supervolcano

222!&%


10/49

"e departe, cea mai misterioasa constructie megalitica din Europa este odulBriasilor de la onoarele!


11/49

egendele locale ne spun ca a fost construit de ovan orgovan (Fercule)' insa dacaaplicam dove#ile din noua cronologie radicala a istoriei, vom descoperi detaliisurprin#atoare!

@&ia acum istoricii isi dau seama ca odul de la "ro&eta nu putea fi construit de niciun fel de romani, si nici de vreo alta civili#atie antica - dove#ile aici'222!dacia!org4daciarevival4forum4roianus4Mardon' avand la dispo#itie tehnica fulgeruluiglo&ular, au construit nu numai podul de la "ro&eta in timp record (doar catevasaptamani), dar si podul Briasilor de la onoarele!

>ot imrod a construit templul de la +aal&e3 care contine &locuri de granit colosale

(peste .000 de tone)' toate detaliile despre levitatia acustica si tehnica fulgeruluiglo&ular aici'

222!davidic3e!com4forum4sho2thread!php=t.$..6%
http://www.dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/297-pompeiherculane-distruse-de-eruptia-vulcanului-vesuvius-dupa-anul-1700-en#309http://www.dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/297-pompeiherculane-distruse-de-eruptia-vulcanului-vesuvius-dupa-anul-1700-en#309http://www.dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/297-pompeiherculane-distruse-de-eruptia-vulcanului-vesuvius-dupa-anul-1700-en#309http://www.dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/297-pompeiherculane-distruse-de-eruptia-vulcanului-vesuvius-dupa-anul-1700-en#309http://www.dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/297-pompeiherculane-distruse-de-eruptia-vulcanului-vesuvius-dupa-anul-1700-en#309http://www.dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/297-pompeiherculane-distruse-de-eruptia-vulcanului-vesuvius-dupa-anul-1700-en#309http://www.dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/297-pompeiherculane-distruse-de-eruptia-vulcanului-vesuvius-dupa-anul-1700-en#309http://www.dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/297-pompeiherculane-distruse-de-eruptia-vulcanului-vesuvius-dupa-anul-1700-en#309http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=282261http://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/profilehttp://www.dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/297-pompeiherculane-distruse-de-eruptia-vulcanului-vesuvius-dupa-anul-1700-en#309http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=282261


12/49

@cum, putem sa re#olvam misterul civili#atiilor a#tece si ma1ase!!!
https://books.google.ro/books?id=YcjFAV4WZ9MC&printsec=frontcover&dq=history+science+or+fiction&hl=ro&sa=X&ei=MNvVVP61JcmBywORjIDIAg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=history%20science%20or%20fiction&f=falsehttps://books.google.ro/books?id=YcjFAV4WZ9MC&printsec=frontcover&dq=history+science+or+fiction&hl=ro&sa=X&ei=MNvVVP61JcmBywORjIDIAg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=history%20science%20or%20fiction&f=false


13/49

;tim sigur ca monumentele colosale de la >eotihuacan, Cholula (legendele localespun ca a fost construita de Ielhua, adica imrod), Monte @l&an (nivelare de varf demunte, aminteste de +aal&e3), alenVue, Copan, >i3al, Chichen t#a, >iahuanaco,Cu#co-;acsahuaman (cratere de vulcani folosite ca furnale pentru topit metale, la felca la E#ion-Pe&er) au fost construite de imrod, adica de olmeci (includem aici

capurile4figurinele uriase, %5-%6 tone fiecare, lucrate in &a#alt)! ;tim ca fii lui Sushdispuneau nu numai de tehnica fulgerului glo&ular care le permitea sa efectue#elucrari de mare anvergura (podul de la "ro&eta, Fagia ;ophia, ruinele de la alm1ra)dar si de harti precise care locali#au @merica de ord4;ud!

n opinia mea, ma1an calendar stelae ( 222!google!ro4search=um%OhlroO!!!5l0l/.$l%000l0!/!%!%), hieroglifele ma1ase, sarcofagul de laalenVue, au fost adaugate @ C@>E?@ decenii dupa ce imrod a fost ucis, deaceiasi conspiratori (siris4Misraim4Forus) care au construit si templele de la Sarnacsi u*or, unde au tre&uit sa invente#e un nou alfa&et si o modalitate de e*primareprin hieroglife, si care stiau &ine de tot de e*istenta @mericii de ord4;ud!

>roia Constantinopole +a&1lon, storia' Lictiune sau ;tiinta= volumul , pg! Citatul original este tradus astfel'

John notes the time of the ne*t event as just &efore the assoverLeast! @ccording to ancient Je2ish rec3oning, the assover Least da12ould have run from sundo2n >hursda1 until sundo2n on Lrida1!

"haranis
http://www.google.ro/search?um=1&hl=ro&biw=1436&bih=700&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=maya+stelae&oq=maya+stelae&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=172l3343l0l11l10l0l5l5l0l328l1000l0.3.1.1http://www.google.ro/search?um=1&hl=ro&biw=1436&bih=700&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=maya+stelae&oq=maya+stelae&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=172l3343l0l11l10l0l5l5l0l328l1000l0.3.1.1http://www.google.ro/search?um=1&hl=ro&biw=1436&bih=700&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=maya+stelae&oq=maya+stelae&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=172l3343l0l11l10l0l5l5l0l328l1000l0.3.1.1https://books.google.ro/books?id=YcjFAV4WZ9MC&printsec=frontcover&dq=history+science+or+fiction&hl=ro&sa=X&ei=MNvVVP61JcmBywORjIDIAg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=history%20science%20or%20fiction&f=falsehttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/337-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/reporthttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/337-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=replyhttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/337-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=replyhttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/337-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=quotehttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/337-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=edithttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/301-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim?limit=10&start=20#338http://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/profilehttp://www.google.ro/search?um=1&hl=ro&biw=1436&bih=700&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=maya+stelae&oq=maya+stelae&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=172l3343l0l11l10l0l5l5l0l328l1000l0.3.1.1http://www.google.ro/search?um=1&hl=ro&biw=1436&bih=700&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=maya+stelae&oq=maya+stelae&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=172l3343l0l11l10l0l5l5l0l328l1000l0.3.1.1https://books.google.ro/books?id=YcjFAV4WZ9MC&printsec=frontcover&dq=history+science+or+fiction&hl=ro&sa=X&ei=MNvVVP61JcmBywORjIDIAg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=history%20science%20or%20fiction&f=falsehttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/337-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/reporthttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/337-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=replyhttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/337-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=replyhttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/337-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=quotehttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/337-re-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim/post?do=edithttp://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/4-dacia-revival/301-iisus-christos-a-fost-crucificat-la-constantinopole-si-nu-la-ierusalim?limit=10&start=20#338http://dacia.org/daciarevival/forum/profile


14/49

>his has caused some scholars to ta3e the position that Johnunderstands the Zast ;upper[ to have ta3en place on :ednesda1evening, just &efore assover! >his cannot &e reconciled 2ith the;1noptic accounts, 2hich clearl1 identif1 the ast ;upper as aassover meal (e!g!, u3e ..'%5)! +ut this is an easil1 e*plained

contradiction! John does not sa1 Zthe da1 &efore assover[ &ut Zjust&efore![ >he episode he relates ne*t, Jesus 2ashing the disciplesYfeet, is done immediatel1 &efore the meal reall1 &egins (%HH$, p! .$5,emp! in orig!)!

Z+efore the assover[ could mean months, da1s, hours, or seconds&efore the meal too3 place! Considering all the evidence, John %/'%ma3es reference to onl1 a fe2 minutes &efore the actual assoverlam& 2as eaten!

222!apologeticspress!org4apcontent!asp*=!!!%%Oarticle%%H6

(super& documentat, recomand aceasta lucrare tuturor cititorilor)

:hat, then, shall 2e ma3e of JohnYs statement that Jesus 2ascrucified on Zthe reparation of the assover=[ @t first glance, 2eassume that John means that the Zpreparation[ concerns the actualassover lam&! Fo2ever, that assumption is not correct! >heZpreparation[ descri&ed &1 John simpl1 2as the da1 &efore the;a&&ath that fell during the assover festival! ens3i noted' Z:henJohn uses the e*ceptional com&ination paras3uea tou pascha,Wreparation of the assover,Y he simpl1 has in mind the Lrida1 of the

assover festival, the one that occurs during the festival 2ee3! >he;a&&ath of this great 2ee3 2as considered especiall1 hol1, andpreparation 2as made accordingl1[ (p! %.7%)!

n fact, the translators of the ? 2ere so confident of this meaningthat the1 rendered the verse' Zt 2as the da1 of reparation ofassover 2ee3, a&out the si*th hour![ n their commentar1 on the? passage, +r1ant and Srause remar3ed'

>he force of the ?Ys interpretation is that this is ZLrida1 ofassover :ee3![ :hile this ma1 &e 2hat John intends (and &elievehe does), it is possi&le to interpret this as Zreparation for theassover,[ i!e!, >hursda1! >his is the translation of the D;? andothers, &ut this is ever1 &it as guilt1 as the ? of overtranslationX!@ctuall1, the te*t is am&iguous and cannot ans2er the da1 of the2ee3 &1 itself! t is from other considerations that 2e shouldconclude that this is Lrida1X (%HH$, p! /76)!

f John %H'%


15/49

assover feast, then JohnYs timeta&le 2ould match perfectl1 2ith thatof the other three Pospels\almost!

"eci, in mod incredi&il, chiar si citatul din oan ne spune ca, C@

CE@ "E >@@, sau assover Meal a avut loc E ;;@ %< (Joiseara - ?ineri seara)!

@u e*istat multe incercari de a muta data Cinei cea de >aina spreMiercuri (issan %/)' toate se &a#au pe citatul tradus gresit din oan%/'%! Mai mult, acele interpretari vroiau sa spuna ca de fapt Cina ceade >aina nu era decat o masa o&isnuita, pentru a e*plica faptul capainea de la masa era una dospita (artos in original) si nu a#umos(nedospita)! ;i mai mult, apelau la o alta traducere a te*telor dinMatei, Marcu si uca pentru a muta data spre Miercuri, issan %.'

insa toate aceste incercari se &a#ea#a, din nou, pe citatul tradus gresitdin oan %/'%!

jimm1a3in!com42as-the-last-supper-a-passover-meal(o anali#a dee*ceptie' Cina cea de >aina assover Meal)

alta anali#a asupra citatului din oan %/'%'

&oo3s!google!ro4&oo3s=iddfogiERdc3COam!!!.03rauseOffalse

;i o alta lucrare de e*ceptie care e*plica ca, data crucificarii, nuputea avea loc Miercuri (pentru a adresa alte pareri e*primate peacest su&iect)'

&i&lelight!net4pasover!htm

Cei care au studiat >orah vor afla cu surprindere ca e*istat douaintervale de timp "LED>E pentru assover4;ar&atoarea @#imilor'in E*od %. si /E E, adicaassover Meal coincide cu prima #i de @#imiQ in evitic ./'5!6intervalul este de > E, assover ] alte sapte #ile' desigur cae*plicatia oferita a fost ca de fapt intervalul este tot de sapte #ile,fiind vor&a de interpretarea acordata cuvintelor din te*tul original!

nsa interdictia asupra lucrarilor de sluga4servitor ramane'
http://jimmyakin.com/was-the-last-supper-a-passover-mealhttps://books.google.ro/books?id=dfogiEOQdckC&pg=PA376&lpg=PA376&dq=john+preparation+day+passover+actually+friday+bryant+krause&source=bl&ots=9Oo7kcGcL5&sig=hltpYk2Yq1I1RzKDB-H_0V-88IY&hl=ro&sa=X&ei=WvTVVNmTFaWeywOzjoHoDw&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=john%20preparation%20day%20passover%20actually%20friday%20bryant%20krause&f=falsehttp://biblelight.net/pasover.htmhttp://jimmyakin.com/was-the-last-supper-a-passover-mealhttps://books.google.ro/books?id=dfogiEOQdckC&pg=PA376&lpg=PA376&dq=john+preparation+day+passover+actually+friday+bryant+krause&source=bl&ots=9Oo7kcGcL5&sig=hltpYk2Yq1I1RzKDB-H_0V-88IY&hl=ro&sa=X&ei=WvTVVNmTFaWeywOzjoHoDw&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=john%20preparation%20day%20passover%20actually%20friday%20bryant%20krause&f=falsehttp://biblelight.net/pasover.htm


16/49

n #iua 9nti s ave8i adunare sfnt, 9n #iua a Aaptea iar adunaresfntQ Ai 9n acele #ile s nu face8i nici un fel de lucru dect numaicele ce tre&uie fiecruia de mncat, numai acelea s vi le face8i!(E*od %.'%6)

umeri .$'%$

n #iua dinti, s fie o adunare sfnt' s nu face8i nici o lucrare deslug 9n ea!

"EC, C@ CE@ "E >@@, CLDM CDPELC@E, "E;CDED CDEC>E " @ %/'%, @ @?B>C E ;;@ %E,CEE@ CE CLDM@ C@ @B>DB4@B>D E?@PFEE

"B@ @ F@+@D B @?E@B "E DBCE ;>@>E BMED ; E?>C!

Mai mult, "r! @3iva +el3 anali#ea#a cu grija fiecare gest4actiunedescrisa in capitolul %/ din oan si e*plica cum sunt C@C@>E M" PD@? toate preceptele din >orah'

222!je2ishpath!org4hdsha&&ospesach2h1ntisunre!html

"ear reader, these t1pes of pro&lems are generall1 un3no2n to most

Christians 4 Messianics &ecause the1 do not trul1 understand the>orah or the correct process of the esach seder! >he1 havenTtconsider that Jesus too3 leavened &read instead of mat#oh! >he1 donTt3no2 that one does not &egin the esach meal 2ithout first sa1ing3iddush! Fo2 2ould the1 3no2 that 3iddush is not said in the middleof the esach meal= Fo2 2ould the1 3no2 that the &lessing is firstsaid on the 2ine and then on the mat#oh=

Fol1 reader, 2hat these contradictions to the >orah sho2 is thateither the 2riters did not 3no2 the most &asic precepts of >orah orthat the1 openl1 violated the ver1 concept of esach! :h1 2ouldthe1 go to prepare= :h1 2ould the1 rid the house of chomet#= :h12ould the1 &other if the1 2ere going to eat chomet#, &read an12a1=

Fol1 reader, these are just a fe2 of the man1 pro&lems presented2ithin the e2 >estament! >here are man1 more!
http://www.jewishpath.org/hdshabbospesachwhyntisunre.htmlhttp://www.jewishpath.org/hdshabbospesachwhyntisunre.html


17/49

ater during the esach meal 2e read that Jesus, according to John,Fe ^Jesus_ arose from supper, and laid aside his garments and too3a to2el and girded himself and that he poured 2ater into a &asin and&egan to :@;F >FE ";CE; feet, and to 2ipe them 2ith theto2el!!! John %/'/,his should &e a clearsign to an1 Je2 li3e the other aforementioned pro&lems that Jesusand his disciples 2ere > >D@F +;ED?@> >he1 openl1diso&e1ed the commands of P-d` >here is no missing this` t is&latant`

noua dovada clara asupra faptului ca +i&lia a fostcreata4scrisa4falsificata e*trem de recent din punct de vederecronologic, si ca isus nu a fost crucificat a&solut deloc la erusalim,si ca nu a fost evreu, asa cum am e*plicat in primele doua pagini!

Citatul din oan %/ cu lucrarea de sluga a carui protagonist a fostchiar etru, anulea#a4elimina porunca clara din umeri si E*od,re#ervata pentru prima #i de aste4prima #i de @#imi, odiscrepanta4de#acord evident care nu putea sa ramana neo&servattimp de .000 de ani!

ast Edit' %. Le& .0%5 0H'


18/49

"in nou, assover4esach se sar&atoreste pe issan %here must have &een e*treme eagerness on the part of theliterar1 factions interested to rush their 2or3, in order to secure someadvantages of po2er and profit to themselves!

@tat >almudul cat si >orah au fost create "B@ inventarea tiparului'



19/49

@&ia acum, cercetatorii isi dau seama ca fenomenelegeologice4atmosferice legate de cele #ece plagi au avut loc datoritaeruptiei vulcanului >hera (insula ;antorini), insa acest lucru estedatat, chiar si in datarea catastrofala a cronologiei oficiale, CEB> CB %00 "E @ @>E "E ED@"@ C@DE ;E

DE;BBE C@ @D L @?B> C EI"B (si aici toateversiunile e*plicative4posi&ile, din cronologia oficiala, sunt luate incalcul)'

forum!tfes!org4inde*!php=topic%%$/!msg


20/49

(inclusiv conclu#iile lui ! Lin3elstein)

srael Lin3elstein (rofessor of @rchaeolog1 at >el @viv Bniversit1),demonstrea#a e*act acest lucru in lucrarea clasica' +i&le Bnearthed

&oo3s!google!ro4&oo3s=idlu6121Jr0CMCOam!!!3elsteinOffalse

;i documentarul cu acelasi nume'

Bnul dintre cei mai renumiti arheologi din lume, "r!Punnar Feinsohn, demonstrea#a ca perioada atri&uita in cronologia

oficiala intre .%00 i!e!n! - 600 i!e!n! nu a e*istat niciodata'222!specialt1interests!net4heinsohn!html (e*ceptional documentat)ast Edit' %/ Le& .0%5 %0'.. &1 "haranis! Deport to moderatorRuic3 Depl1Depl1RuoteEdit

Re: Iisus Christos a fost crucificat la Constantinopole si nu

la Ierusalim 1" Feb 2015 06:0$ !"0

Bna dintre cele mai mari dureri de cap ale arheologilor4istoricilor

este repre#entata de ta&litele de la @mmi#aduga (atri&uite incronologia oficiala ca fiind alcatuite in secolul ? i!e!n!), careinfatisea#a datarile astronomice ale planetei ?enus, pe o perioada de.% de ani!

222!s3epticfiles!org4neocat4ammi!htm

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%6/56H/Gmsg%6/56H/

TFo2 e*plain these o&servations of the ancient astronomers, modern

astronomers and historians have as3ed! :ere the1 2ritten in aconditional form (f ?enus disappeared on the %%th of ;ivan ! ! !) =o, the1 2ere e*pressed categoricall1!>he o&servations 2ere inaccuratel1 registered, decided someauthors! Fo2ever, inaccurac1 ma1 account for a fe2 da1sT difference&ut not for a difference of months!

>he o&servations 2ere inaccuratel1 registered, decided some

"haranis

: E

;enior +oarder

osts'


21/49

authors! Fo2ever, inaccurac1 ma1 account for a fe2 da1sT difference&ut not for a difference of months! >he invisi&ilit1 of ?enus atsuperior conjunction is given as 5 months %6 da1s instead of thecorrect difference of . months 6 da1s, noted the translators of thete*t, 2onderingl1!

nregistrarile astronomice releva faptul ca or&ita planetei ?enus erafoarte diferita decat cea care poate fi o&servata in pre#ent' o incalcaretotala nu numai a celor trei legi atri&uite lui Sepler, dar si a legii deatractie gravitationala!

@&ia acum, cercetatorii isi dau seama ca @ten, o&iectul de adoratie allui @3henaten, nu era ;oarele deloc, ci planeta ?enus'


22/49

"iferenta dintre @men si @ten'

222!varchive!org4ce4amenaten!htm

Cea mai formida&ila lucrare care dovedeste ca Moise si @3henatensunt unul si acelasi personaj'

222!scri&d!com4doc4./70sarion

n noua cronologie radicala a istoriei, @3henaten este unul dintre fiiilui imrod, iar e*odul sau din Egipt in Canaan repre#inta de faptadevarata poveste din spatele e*odului &i&lic! @cest e*od a avut loc

in timpul unei catastrofe geologice inregistrata in legendele tuturorpopoarelor!

utini oameni de stiinta stiu sau inteleg ca opera lui e2ton a fostscrisa4alcatuita de catre un grup de persoane diferite' lucrarile saledespre alchimie, rincipia, scrisorile catre +entle1, lden&urg si
http://www.varchive.org/ce/amenaten.htmhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/237046312/Irish-Origins-of-Civilization-Vol2-2007-Michael-Tsarionhttp://www.varchive.org/ce/amenaten.htmhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/237046312/Irish-Origins-of-Civilization-Vol2-2007-Michael-Tsarion


23/49

Falle1 au origini diferite!

Cei care au scris acele scrisori catre +entle1 si Falle1 au avut curajulsa spuna lucrurilor pe nume, si anume ca gravitatia terestra este o

forta de DE;BE si nicidecum de atractie (iar in rincipia,cuvantul atractie nu este mentionat)!

@ici este scrisoarea lui e2ton catre Falle1, care descrie cum adedus legea proportionalitatii inverse cu patratul distantei folosindipote#a e*istentei eterului, la care se refera cu sintagma spiritul careco&oara'

!!!@cum daca acest spirit (eter) descinde cu vite#a uniforma,densitatea sa si prin aceasta forta sa vor fi reciproc proportionale cupatratul distantei de la centru! "ar daca va descinde cu miscare

accelerata, densitatea sa se va diminua in timp ce vite#a va creste,deci si forta (avand in vedere ipote#a) va fi de aceeasi magnitudine cainainte, adica inca intr-un mod reciproc cu patratul distantei de lacentru!

Mai mult, ei spun ca e*ista doua forte gravitationale separate' una depresiune (gravitatia terestra), iar una de rotatie (gravitatiaresponsa&ila pentru or&itele planetelor4stelelor)'

saac e2ton credea ca gravitatia este cau#ata de de&itul eteruluiasupra corpurilor ceresti! @ discutat aceasta teorie in scrisori catre

lden&urg, Falle1, si +o1le!e2ton inca credea ca planetele si ;oarele erau pastrate pe or&iteregulate prin actiunea vorte*urilor de eter, si ca gravitatia estecau#ata de de&itul eterului circulant!

;i au mers si mai departe'

scrisoare catre +entle1' Ca gravitatia sa fie un concept innascut,inerent si apartinand in mod esential materiei, astfel incat un corp saactione#e asupra altui corp la distanta prin vid, fara alt intermediu, cuajutorul caruia si prin care actiunea si fortele acestor corpuri sa fietransmise, ar fi un concept atat de e*traordinar de a&surd incat suntde parere ca nici un om, care gandeste intr-un mod rational in ceea cepriveste notiunile filosofice, nu ar putea sa ajunga la o asemeneaconclu#ie!


24/49

ar ga#ele din atmosfera nu se supun deloc unei forte de atractie'

%! ngredientele aerului -o*igen, a#ot, argon i alte ga#e de i nu su& form de compu i ci de amestec, se gsesc 9n propor ie egal ladiferite nivele ale atmosferei, 9n ciuda marilor diferen e 9n

greutatealor specific! E*plica ia acceptat de tiin este aceasta' Z?nturile puternice pstrea# ga#ele &ine amestecate, a a c, 9nafar de vaporiide ap, compo#i ia atmosferei este la fel 9n toattroposfera, pn la un 9nalt grad de apro*imare[

@ceast e*plica ie nu poate fi adevrat!"ac ar fi fost, atunci 9nmomentul 9n care vntul dispare, a#otul ar tre&ui s urce 9n sus, io*igenul s co&oare, urmat de argon! "ac vnturile sunt cau#ate dediferen a de greutate dintre aerul cald i celrece, diferen a de greutate dintre ga#ele grele de la nivelele superioare ale atmosferei i ga#eleu oare de la nivelele inferioare, ar tre&ui s cree#e furtuni, care ar

disprea doar dup ce fiecare ga# s-ar fi po#i ionat la locul luinatural, 9n acord cu gravita ia acestuia sau cu greutatea specific! "arnimic de acest fel nu se 9ntmpl! Cnd unii aviatori i-au e*primatconvingereac Zpungi de ga#e to*ice[ e*ist 9n aer, savan ii au replicat' Zue*ist Wpungi de ga#e to*iceY! ici un singur ga#, i nici un altamestec de ga#e, nu poate avea, la temperatur i presiune normale,aceia i densitate ca i aerul atmosferic! "eci, o pung cu ga# din atmosfer, mai mult ca sigur ar ni 9n sus ca un &alon, sau s-ar scufunda ca o piatr 9n ap![

"e ce, atunci, ga#ele atmosferice nu se separ i s stea separate,conform cu gravita ia lor specific=

.! #onul, de i mai greu dect o*igenul, este a&sent din straturileinferioare ale atmosferei, i este pre#ent 9n straturile superioare, i nu este su&iectul Zefectului de amestecare creat de vnt[! re#en ao#onului, sus 9n atmosfer, sugerea# c o*igenul tre&uie s fie i maigreu' Z"eoarece o*igenul este mai pu in dens dect o#onul, acestavatinde s se ridice la 9nl imi chiar mai mari[! icieri nu se9ntrea&de ce o#onul nu co&oar conform propriei sale greut i, saucel pu in de ce nu este amestecat cu alte ga#e, de ctre vnt!

/! @pa, de i de opt sute de ori mai grea dect aerul, este men inut su&form de picturi, de milioane de tone, la 3ilometri deasupramntului! orii i cea a sunt compu i din picturi care sfidea# gravita ia!


25/49

;i avem si parado*ul presiunii &arometrice'

semi-diurn 9n presiunea &arometric nu este e*plica&il prinprincipiul mecanicist al gravita iei i prin efectul de 9ncl#ire datoratradia iei solare! Cau#ele acestor varia ii sunt necunoscute!

Z;e cunoa te acum , ct i cu dou secole i jumtate 9n urm, c e*ist mai mult sau mai pu in, varia ii #ilnice ale presiunii &arometrice, culminnd cu dou ma*ime i dou minime, 9n decursula .< de ore! @celea i o&serva ii au fost fcute, i au creat nedumeriri, la fiecare sta ie la care erau pstrate i studiate 9nregistrrile de presiune, dar fr succes 9n aflarea unei e*plica ii fi#ice complete!?or&ind despre varia ia diurn i semi-diurn a &arometrului, ord

Da1leigh #ice'[Magnitudinea relativ a celei din urm varia ia semi-diurnb,a acum a fost o&servat 9n multe locuri de pe suprafa a mntului, este9nc un mister, toate 9ncercrile de e*plicare fiind ilu#orii[

Bn ma*im este la %0 a!m!, un altul la %0 p!m!Q cele dou minimesuntla < a!m! i la < p!m!! Efectul de 9ncl#ire creat de ;oare, nu poatee*plica nici timpul cnd apare ma*imul, nici timpul cnd apareminimul acestor varia ii semi-diurne! "ac presiunea devine mai

micfr ca aerul s devin mai u or, printr-o e*pansiune lateraldatorat cldurii, aceasta tre&uie s 9nsemne c aceia i mas de aergravitea# cu schim&ara for ei, la diferite ore!

222!davidic3e!com4forum4sho2thread!php=t.$.%77 (pre#entareaparado*ului presiunii &arometrice, cu toate detaliile necesare)

"eci, conspiratorii care au falsificat istoria, au fost nevoiti sa falsificesi stiinta oficiala, pentru a insela si mai usor lumea!

nsa nu aveau la dispo#itie formula astelui a lui S!L! Pauss, deaceea falsificarea istorica a celor sapte sinoade ecumenice, a&iografiei lui "ion1sius E*iguus a fost efectuata in gra&a, intr-unmod catastrofal de gresit, evidentiat in mesajele postate pana acum insirurile mele de discutii!
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=282177http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=282177http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=282177


26/49

"ove#ile care ne arata ca atat ompei cat si Ferculane au fostdistruse de eruptia vulcanului ?e#uviu CE B> dupa %700 e!n!'

222!dacia!org4daciarevival4forum4


27/49


28/49

;! Munster ne spune, fara echivoc, ca eruptia vulcanului ?e#uviu care a distrusompei, a avut loc in anul 7H e!n!

>he eruption of ?esuvius is no2 set as the 1ear 7H @" and lin1Ys Fistoriaaturalis is descri&ed &1 Munster as having &een a major influence upon his

o2n 2or3!

&oo3s!google!ro4&oo3s=id5P-?BS*@l$COam!!!QVplin1Offalse

ata si o harta desenata4alcatuita de Munster, care infatisea#a sudul taliei'
http://books.google.ro/books?id=5G-VUKxAIl8C&printsec=frontcover&hl=ro&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=pliny&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=5G-VUKxAIl8C&printsec=frontcover&hl=ro&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=pliny&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=5G-VUKxAIl8C&printsec=frontcover&hl=ro&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=pliny&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=5G-VUKxAIl8C&printsec=frontcover&hl=ro&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=pliny&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=5G-VUKxAIl8C&printsec=frontcover&hl=ro&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=pliny&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=5G-VUKxAIl8C&printsec=frontcover&hl=ro&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=pliny&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=5G-VUKxAIl8C&printsec=frontcover&hl=ro&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=pliny&f=falsehttps://www.bergbook.com/images/22775-01.jpghttp://books.google.ro/books?id=5G-VUKxAIl8C&printsec=frontcover&hl=ro&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=pliny&f=false


29/49

"ar, in aceeasi perioada a istoriei, in %570, cel mai mare cartograf alDenasterii, @&raham rtelius, in cel faimos set de harti din toate timpurile,>heatrum r&is, pre#inta harta sudului taliei, eapolitanum Degnum'

ME, D@; @ @C>?>@>E'

222!&erg&oo3!com4images4..775-0%!jpg

Ce alegere sa facem, Munster sau rtelius=

n cronologia oficiala, rtelius nu primeste nici un fel de repros din partealocuitorilor sudului taliai, sau din partea vreunui alt cartograf de renume!>>, de la mic la mare, accepta fara comentarii, harta eapoletanumDegnum, nici un fel de scandal care sa-i fi patat &iografia!

Cum e posi&il ca nimeni dintre cititorii lucrarii Cosmographia, semnata ;!Munster, sa nu fi comentat imediat, la vederea hartilor lui rtelius, careinfatisea#a ompei ca oras in plina activitate=

Cum e posi&il ca ontiful Prigore I sa fi indra#nit sa spuna ca ar fi e*istatun decalaj de #ece #ile intre calendarul iulian si cel propus de @lo1sius ilius,daca ompei functiona &ine mersi e*act in acea decada a istoriei=

;a punem cunostintele istoricilor care accepta fara pro&leme documenteleatri&uite Denasterii, la o si mai mare incercare!
https://www.bergbook.com/images/22775-01.jpghttps://www.bergbook.com/images/22775-01.jpg


30/49


31/49

e drumul de la apoli la sud de >orre @nnun#iata, la %5 3m deapoli, sepoate vedea pe fa ada ?illa Laraon Mennela un monument - i anumeun epitaf pentru victimele erup iei ?e#uviului din %6/% e!n! - a se vedea dou lespe#i depiatra cu te*tul 9n lim&a latin! ntr-una din ele, pe langa Desina i ortici, sunt

men ionate 9n lista de ora e distruse ora ele ompei i Ferculaneum`

ME; Ferculaneum C>@?@BM, ED;>DC>;DE>@ E> orticu

PARADOXUL DISTRIBUTIEI GREUTATII EMISFERELOR
http://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61373.msg1601888#msg1601888http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=39361.msg982148#msg982148http://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61373.msg1601888#msg1601888http://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61373.msg1601888#msg1601888http://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61373.msg1601888#msg1601888http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61373.msg1601888#msg1601888http://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61373.msg1601888#msg1601888http://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://skywalker.cochise.edu/wellerr/students/pangea/pangea_files/image003.jpghttp://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=282256http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61373.msg1601888#msg1601888http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=39361.msg982148#msg982148http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1616174#msg1616174


32/49

Zona de uscat din emisfera nordic a Pm!ntu"ui este #ntr$un ra%ortde trei "a unu fa& de 'ona de uscat din emisfera sudic( Greutateamedia a uscatu"ui este de dou si trei %trimi mai )rea dec!t cea aa%ei* consider!nd ad!ncimea mri"or #n am+e"e emisfere ca ,inde)a"- emisfera nordic %!n "a ni.e"u" mrii este mai )rea dec!temisfera sudic- dac considerm distri+u&ia mri"or /i a uscatu"ui*

mase"e de uscat de deasu%ra re%re'int mase su%"imentare( Daraceast distri+u&ie ine)a" de mase- nu afectea' %o'i&iaPm!ntu"ui- deoarece acesta nu$/i %"asea' emisfera nordic cu fa&actre Soare( O0for& moart1 cum este )ra.ita&ia nu ar %utea %stra

#n ec2i"i+ru- #ncrctura ine)a" a Pm!ntu"ui( De asemenea-distri+u&ia se'onier a )2e&ii /i '%e'ii- sc2im+!ndu$se %rintr$un%roces de disti"are- dintr$o emisfer #n a"ta- ar tre+ui s interfere'ecu ec2i"i+ru" Pm!ntu"ui- dar aceasta nu se #nt!m%"(

Su%rafata ariei emisferei nordice a Pamantu"ui este de trei ori maimare decat cea a emisferei sudice(

Greutatea medie a %amantu"ui este de 3-45 ori mai mare decat ceaa a%ei 6%entru un anumit .o"um7(

Deci- )reutatea emisferei nordice- %ana "a ni.e"u" marii- %e %rimii 839m- este mai mare decat cea a emisferei sudice- conform 2arti"orcare ni se %re'inta in )eo)ra,a o,cia"a(

Muntii- dea"uri"e si a"te forme de re"ief di.erse re%re'inta sarciniaditiona"e de )reutate deasu%ra ni.e"u"ui marii(

Deci Pamantu" sferic are o sarcina de )reutate ine)a"a- %e %rimii 839m- care re%re'inta o inca"care a "e)ii de atractie )ra.itationa"a-care ne s%une ca forta de atractie este %ro%ortiona"a cu masa( Inacest mod- Pamantu" ar tre+ui sa se roteasca cu Po"u" :ord catreSoare- date ,ind sarcini"e de )reutate a"e ce"or doua sectiuni deemisfera(

In ceea ce %ri.este continentu" Pan)eea- situatia este si maidramatica(

s9;


33/49

Ori)inea Granitu"ui

Granitu" este roca cu cea mai mare ras%andire in scoarta terestra( :ise s%une ca aceasta roca eru%ti.a %ro.ine din racirea si

conso"idarea ma)mei din interioru" Pamantu"ui 6.arianta2e"iocentrica7(

:umai ca eista o %ro+"ema fundamenta"a )ranitu" to%it nu se .atransforma niciodata in )ranit din nou* structura crista"ina .a a.ea ocom%o'itie diferita si anume RIOLIT(


34/49

;o the %5th ovem&er! (Calvisius,


35/49

n the aftermath of the eruption, Pree3 historian and &iographerlutarch 2rote' Z>hose 2ho 2ent there &1 da1light felt ignorance anduncertaint1 as to 2here ompeii and Ferculaneum had &een situated![

perele lui Calvisius, ;caliger, si etavius au fost create si printate celputin dupa anul %700 e!n!Q iar atat ;caliger cat si etavius ilmentionea#a pe Euse&ius!!!deci "e Emendatione >emporum, "e"octrina >emporum si pus Chronologicum sunt pu&licate cam dupaanul %750 e!n!

+iografia lui ol1dore ?ergil (cel mai renumit istoric al Denasterii,varianta oficiala)'



36/49

222!agape&i&lestud1!com4documents4"ating!!!.0of.0a#areth!htm

&oo3s!google!ro4&oo3s=id0r6$pgg+;&gCOam!!!ronolog1Offalse(pg! ..$)

@ceste e*emple sunt suficiente pentru a vedea cat de usor poate fifalsificata4inventata o istorie complet fictiva!!!

ar J! Sepler greseste in mod catastrofal calcularea calendaruluigregorian' este de total acord cu aceasta reforma!

Sepler advocated the adoption of the reformed calendar in a 2or3

entitled "ialogue on the Pregorian Calendar pu&lished in %6%.!articles!adsa&s!harvard!edu44full4%H.0@!!!%$400000.%!000!html

n %6%/, the Emperor Matthias as3ed Sepler to attend the Deichstag atDegens&urg to counsel on the issue of adopting the Pregoriancalendar reform in Perman1! n Perman1, the rotestant princes hadrefused to accept the calendar on confessional grounds! Sepler&elieved that the ne2 calendar 2as sufficientl1 e*act to satisf1 allneeds for man1 centuries! >hus, he proposed that the Emperor issue ageneral imperial decree to implement the calendar!

;uper inamicul ?aticanului, P! Palilei, in mod incredi&il, este si el deacord cu reforma gregoriana!

Clavius 2as the senior mathematician on the commission for thereform of the calendar that led, in %5$., to the institution of thePregorian calendar!

Lrom his universit1 da1s, Palileo 2as familiar 2ith ClaviusTs &oo3s,and he visited the famous man during his first trip to Dome in %5$7!@fter that the1 corresponded from time to time a&out mathematicalpro&lems, and Clavius sent Palileo copies of his &oo3s as the1appeared!

&oo3s!google!ro4&oo3s=ido6-$+@@@R+@JOam!!!calendarOffalse

>hesaurus >emporum, pu&lished &1 Joseph ;caliger, 2hich 2as &ased
http://www.agapebiblestudy.com/documents/Dating%20the%20Birth%20of%20Jesus%20of%20Nazareth.htmhttp://www.agapebiblestudy.com/documents/Dating%20the%20Birth%20of%20Jesus%20of%20Nazareth.htmhttp://books.google.ro/books?id=0r68pggBSbgC&pg=PA228&lpg=PA228&dq=kepler+de+vero+anno+chronology&source=bl&ots=UvGKnxjzKK&sig=eNKCwN2jvlP19kP8-zNo50nbr5g&hl=ro&ei=JIwqTvq0BcbDtAa2x8yGDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=kepler%20de%20vero%20anno%20chronology&f=falsehttp://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1920PA.....28...18L/0000021.000.htmlhttp://books.google.ro/books?id=o6-8BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA24&lpg=PA24&dq=galileo+galilei+gregorian+calendar&source=bl&ots=ORPJHVLJB5&sig=MMjwonnPkIE6XYnFrcMCS3Yow20&hl=ro&sa=X&ei=UStiVO3mFY2zaczhgMAN&ved=0CB4Q6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=galileo%20galilei%20gregorian%20calendar&f=falsehttp://www.agapebiblestudy.com/documents/Dating%20the%20Birth%20of%20Jesus%20of%20Nazareth.htmhttp://www.agapebiblestudy.com/documents/Dating%20the%20Birth%20of%20Jesus%20of%20Nazareth.htmhttp://books.google.ro/books?id=0r68pggBSbgC&pg=PA228&lpg=PA228&dq=kepler+de+vero+anno+chronology&source=bl&ots=UvGKnxjzKK&sig=eNKCwN2jvlP19kP8-zNo50nbr5g&hl=ro&ei=JIwqTvq0BcbDtAa2x8yGDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=kepler%20de%20vero%20anno%20chronology&f=falsehttp://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1920PA.....28...18L/0000021.000.htmlhttp://books.google.ro/books?id=o6-8BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA24&lpg=PA24&dq=galileo+galilei+gregorian+calendar&source=bl&ots=ORPJHVLJB5&sig=MMjwonnPkIE6XYnFrcMCS3Yow20&hl=ro&sa=X&ei=UStiVO3mFY2zaczhgMAN&ved=0CB4Q6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=galileo%20galilei%20gregorian%20calendar&f=false


37/49

almost entirel1 on the calculations of "ion1sius E*iguus and Matthe2+lastares, received criticism from Johannes Sepler!

"e vreme ce Sepler si-a permis sa critice lucrarea lui ;caliger,

inseamna ca ;>@ foarte &ine continutul operei atri&uite lui Matei?lastar'

Matei ?lastar (%//0 e!n!) despre aste'

Canonul pune dou hotrri cu privire la aAte, deAi a 9ntre&uin8at unastfel de fel de vor&ire, ca noi s nu pr#nuim cu iudeii Ai s aAteptmechinoc8iul de primvar, cror hotrri au urmat numaidect altedou, ca pra#nicul s-l svrAim 9ndat la cea dinti lun plin dupechinoc8iu Ai dup aceasta nu simplu 9n oricare #i, ci 9n #iua prim asptmnii 9ndat dup lun plin!

i celelalte hotrri se 8in cu trie 9nc Ai acuma, iar duminica ceadup lun plin ni se amn adeseori prin aceea c se adaug lapaAtele legii din fiecare an dou #ile Ai apoi se purcede la duminic! ;-a fcut 9ns aceasta nu din neAtiin8a sau ignoran8a rin8ilor ce au datlegea aceasta privitoare la aAte, ci cau#ele lucrului acestuia se reducla cursul lunii, cci deoarece miAcarea anual se restituie iarAi 9n /65de #ile Ai 9n aproape a patra parte de #i, precum s-a #is, iar cursurilemedii ale lunii ce se refer la lungime nu se restituie 9n %H ani 9ntregi,numra8i cu adaosul ptrimii, ci fr de trei se*agesime prime ale unei#ile Ai /7 secunde, din cau#a aceasta se face restituirea numit 9n /0> CEE@ CE Sepler si Palilei ar fi avut de facut, pentru a arata caastronomii ?aticanului ha&ar nu au de astronomie, ar fi fost sa aducaaminte pu&licului despre citatele &inecunoscute ale lui ?lastar!

Mai mult, nu ar fi cum sa nu il mentione#e pe ?lastar, pentru ca


38/49

;1ntagma Canonum era o lucrare &inecunoscuta de catre toticarturarii' faptul ca ?lastar aminteste ca ;inodul de la iceea nu aveacum sa ai&a loc inainte de anul 7$< e!n!, inseamna ca orice omisiune(Sepler4Palilei) ar fi dus la conclu#ia ca atat Sepler cat si Palilei nuaveau cunostintele de &a#a din astronomie care sa le permita sa

pu&lice opinii savante pe acest su&iect!

Prupul de calugari care falsificau de #or operele atri&uite luiCopernic, Palilei si Sepler, nu s-au inteles cu cei care plasmuiau;1ntagma Canonum, si care au atri&uit datarea ;inodului de la iceeacel putin dupa anul 7$< e!n! - de aici si de#acordulinimagina&il4incredi&il al cronologiei oficiale!

e2ton agrees 2ith the date of "ecem&er %%, %5$. as 2ellQ moreover,+ritain and the +ritish Empire adopted the Pregorian calendar in %75.(official chronolog1)!

articles!adsa&s!harvard!edu44full4%H.0@!!!%$400000.

o less a figure than saac e2ton (%6he Chronolog1 of @ncientSingdoms @mended, a su&stantial monograph disputing several 3e1conclusions in ;caligerTs 2or3!

+ut e2ton couldnTt possi&l1 have missed the 2or3 done &1+lastares, and the Vuote attri&uted to the same author!

+enjamin Lran3lin told his readers of the oor DichardTs @lmanac toenjo1 the e*tra %% da1s in &ed and that losing %% da1s did not 2orr1him--after all, Europe had managed since %5$.!

articles!adsa&s!harvard!edu44full4%H.0@!!!%$400000.

+ut in %75. @", the error4discrepanc1 &et2een the false Pregoriancalendar reform and the real calendar 2ould have amounted to a full /(three) da1s difference, a thing that could not have &een missed &1an1 researcher!

n %$06, apoleon, 2e are told, ordered a return to the Pregoriancalendar!

n accordance 2ith the Concordat 2ith ope ius ? (%7


39/49

calendar! n %7 +rumaire Near %< (ovem&er $, %$05) the Minister ofLinance announced the Januar1 %, %$06, return to the Pregoriancalendar 2hich had &een outla2ed in cto&er %7H/!

+ut in %$06 @", the error 2ould have &een at least a full . (t2o) da1s,

and no one could have missed this huge discrepanc1!

>he %0 da1 cumulative error in the ?ernal EVuino* date since theCouncil of icaea until the 1ear %5$. @" is due just to the reform ofthe Julian calendar' if 2e add the a*ial precession argument, then thecumulative errors 2ould have added to even more than %0 da1s,&ecause of the reverse precessional movement! o DE a*ialprecession means that the Earth did not ever or&it around the ;un, as2e have &een led to &elieve! @nd it means that the entire chronolog1of the official histor1 has &een forged at least after %750 @"!

ovestea cu arca lui oe este doar un mit, un &asm pentru copii! araceasta arca s-ar fi inclinat la un asemenea unghi incat plafonul saatinga suprafata apei, si asta de nenumarate ori pe #i, cat a tinutotopul' toti cei de la &ord ar fi avut de parte de conditii imposi&ile delocuit!

Este clar ca in realitate s-a intamplat cu totul si cu totul altcevaQ unsistem de tunele su&terane, asa cum regasim in legendele ti&etane, sisud-americane'

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%


40/49

222!scri&d!com4doc47$5%6%0sar +om&)

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%/0/./%Gmsg%/0/./%

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%/0/./.Gmsg%/0/./.

;uper lucrarea dedicata in special falsificarii e*plo#iei nucleare dela Firoshima'

hei2aco!tripod!com4&om&!htm

Deactor nuclear acumulator de curenti telurici de*trogiri

Este clar ca design-ul unui reactor nuclear este unul defectuosQ atat

>esla cat si Deich au aratat ca, cel mai important factor este densitateacurentilor telurici, acest lucru nu este luat in calcul deloc de catrecercetatorii din domeniul energiei nucleare! Deich a produs un nivelurias de radiatie cu doar un miligram de radiu, folosind cutia sa careacumulea#a curenti telurici! ;e pot reduce dimensiunile foarte mult,dar in acelasi timp poate fi amplificata densitatea acelor curentitelurici (care produc de#integrare4descompunere4inertie)!

J! Chad2ic3 nu a descoperit nici un fel de particula numita neutron'

2e&!archive!org42e&4.0050.060H%%


41/49

Preselile comise de ! +ohr si E! Dutherford'

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%60melting faster, the1 are disintegrating more s2iftl1)!

CE@ M@ EICE>@@ BCD@DE "E;DE EM@DE@DEB>@>ED EIEDME>ED B >! FEDN MD@N ;PB;>@?E E + " LC@ CB@>C@, DELED>@DE @;BD;@ D@"@>D BCE@DE'

john&edini!net4john/


42/49

"escoperirea curentilor telurici' "r! "a1ton Miller

222!orgonela&!org4miller!htm

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%6%50%%Gmsg%6%50%%

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%6%50%/Gmsg%6%50%/

CFD@>@>E@ ;@>@@4MED@ >C@

Capacitatea moleculelor de a e*ista in doua forme de antipo#i optici

se numeste chiralitate! >oti aminoaci#ii din proteinele normale suntlevoaminoaci#i! "upa moartea celulelor, moleculele levogire setransforma in de*trogire!

@cesta a fost cel mai mister investigat de marele inus auling'ME B ;>E "E CE ;B>EM @C@>B> BM@ "MECBE "E -@M@C, ; B " MECBE "E"EI>D@M@C!

;>DBC>BD@ ;@>@@ @ MECBED C@DEC;>DBE;C >E;B>BDE ; DP@EE ;>DBC>BDD

? E;>E "E CFD@>@>E, ; "EC MEDE, E?PD@, CE@ M@ M@DE @D>E!

Ce este &iohomochiralit1!!!toate informatiile de &a#a'

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%


43/49

armonii, intervale si proportii specifice care tre&uiau folosite ca sunete de legatura!!!au utili#atanumite chei mu#icale, proportii si tipare armonice ale contrapunctului, ritmului si tempo-urilor,o adevarata mu#ica matematica!!!

ar Mo#art, poate cel mai faimos personaj istoric din cronologia oficiala a secolului I?, nuputea sa compuna deloc nici una dintre partiturile care ii sunt atri&uite!

222!rense!com4generalhe documented changes in Mo#artTs hand2riting thro2 a further shado2 over the authenticit1of his 2or3s! Careful stud1 of the autographs from the period %770-%7$0 in particular hasrevealed clearl1 discerna&le changes in Mo#artTs script that have largel1 &een accepted aslegitimate developmental changes, even though it has &een ac3no2ledged that these changes donot occur simultaneousl1 or 2ith rigorous consistenc1, and that the1 sometimes occurred Vuite

suddenl1! Lor instance, notational s1m&ols that appeared fairl1 consistentl1 throughout %76Hchanged considera&l1 in the follo2ing 1ear, and, interestingl1 enough, 2ith the autograph for theitan1 S!%.5 from %77. (a piece 2hose authenticit1 is Vuestiona&le), it changed once again(Eisen %HH%' %7/)!

Could it &e that the numerous changes and inconsistencies in Mo#artTs hand2riting over hislifetime 2ere the result of man1 hands masVuerading as one=

>hus, far from &eing a compositional genius and creative force, one is left 2ith the undenia&leimpression of Mo#art as rather a master of appropriation and imitation, and a musical hac3, 2ho2as guilt1 of fraud and deception! >he dou&tful might 2ell as3 if Mo#art 2as indeed capa&le of

this, and if it 2as even in 3eeping 2ith his character, and the ans2er to this is most definitel1T1esT!

>@>E ;onatele pentru pian, semnate Mo#art sunt &a#ate pe teoria foarte precisa a numerelorLi&onacci'

2e&!archive!org42e&4.0%%0$05%/.7%64http'!!!content4vie24%H54..4

Laptul ca mu#ica lui Mo#art (ca e*emplu, sonatele pentru pian) este &a#ata pe formule specialecare includ numarul de aur inseamna ca aceasta mu#ica putea fi compusa de DCE dispuneade acele formuleQ nici eopold Mo#art si nici :!@! Mo#art nu faceau parte, in cronologiaoficiala, din nivelurile inalte ale francmasoneriei pentru a fi &eneficiat de aceste informatiisecrete!

Evidence suggests that classical music composed &1 Mo#art, +eethoven, and +ach em&racesphi!
http://www.rense.com/general45/mozrt.htmhttp://web.archive.org/web/20110805132716/http:/www.artofrecordproduction.com/content/view/195/22/http://www.rense.com/general45/mozrt.htmhttp://web.archive.org/web/20110805132716/http:/www.artofrecordproduction.com/content/view/195/22/


44/49

n a %HH6 article in the @merican ;cientist, for e*ample, Mi3e Sa1 reported that Mo#artYssonatas 2ere divided into t2o parts e*actl1 at the Polden Mean point in almost all cases!nasmuch as Mo#artYs sister had said that @madeus 2as al2a1s pla1ing 2ith num&ers andfascinated &1 mathematics, it appears that this 2as either a conscious choice or an intuitive one!

Mean2hile, "ere3 Fa1loc3 noted that in +eethovenYs Lifth ;1mphon1 (possi&l1 his mostfamous one), the famous opening Zmotto[ appears in the first and last &ars, &ut also at thePolden Mean point (0!6%$) of the 2a1 through the s1mphon1, as 2ell as 0!/$. of the 2a1 (i!e!,the Polden Mean sVuared)! @gain, 2as it &1 design or accident= Seep in mind that +art3,"e&uss1, ;chu&ert, +ach and ;atie ma1 have also deli&eratel1 used the Polden Mean in theirmusic!

222!maths!surre1!ac!u34hosted-sites4D!Sn!!!fi&n@rt!htmlGmo#art

Bnele dintre compo#itiile atri&uite lui +ach de asemenea sunt &a#ate in totalitate pe teoria

numerelor Li&onacci!222!readperiodicals!com4.0%0074.7H%/.H%6%!html (>FE M@>FEM@>C@@DCF>EC>BDE L +@CFT; >FE @D> L LBPBE)

people!sju!edu4Urhall4proposal!pdf preface pg! 5 include o imagine cu proportiile precise alepartiturilor lui +ach

222!limelightmaga#ine!com!au4@rticle4/56!!!-genius-of-&ach!asp*

222!ncurproceedings!org4ojs4inde*!php4C!!!icle4do2nload4%5%4H7 - @n E*amination of J!;!+achTs compositions using the golden ratio and Li&onacci ;eVuence

"aca aplicam dove#ile o&tinute mai devreme din cercetarea acestui su&iect, lucrurile devin simai clare!

Mu#ica lui P!L! Fandel include partituri din mu#ica compusa de ;! Calvisius'

222!jstor!org4pss4//660.5

;! Calvisius mentionea#a, asa cum am va#ut mai devreme, eruptia vulcanului ?esuvius care adistrus atat ompei cat si Ferculane, in pus Chronologicum!

egatura din J!;! +ach si Martin uther'
http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted-sites/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibInArt.html#mozarthttp://www.readperiodicals.com/201007/2791329161.htmlhttp://people.sju.edu/http://www.limelightmagazine.com.au/Article/356061,deconstructing-the-genius-of-bach.aspxhttp://www.ncurproceedings.org/ojs/index.php/NCUR2012/article/download/151/97http://www.ncurproceedings.org/ojs/index.php/NCUR2012/article/download/151/97http://www.jstor.org/pss/3366025http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted-sites/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibInArt.html#mozarthttp://www.readperiodicals.com/201007/2791329161.htmlhttp://people.sju.edu/http://www.limelightmagazine.com.au/Article/356061,deconstructing-the-genius-of-bach.aspxhttp://www.ncurproceedings.org/ojs/index.php/NCUR2012/article/download/151/97http://www.jstor.org/pss/3366025


45/49

222!&aroVuemusic!org4&V*js&ach!html

222!mtio!com4articles4&iss&oo5!htm

Martin uther este un personaj inventat cel putin dupa anul %750 e!n!Q ;upputatio @nnorumMundi este copiata dupa Chronicles de Euse&ius, iar uther il mentionea#a peJerome4Fieron1mus care isi &a#ea#a ist of llustrous Men pe Fistoria Ecclesiastica a luiEuse&ius!!!

J!;! +ach a&out Fandel'

+ach eventuall1 complimented Fandel and his music sa1ing that Fandel 2as the onl1 person 2ould 2ish to &e, 2ere not +ach!

222!personadigitalstudio!com4+ach4J! Fa1dn a&out Fandel'

Bpon hearing the TFallelujah ChorusT from Messiah, Joseph Fa1dn is said to have 2ept li3e achild and e*claimed'

Fe is the master of us all!

:!@! Mo#art a&out Fandel'

:olfgang @madeus Mo#art is said to have remar3ed,Fandel understands effect &etter than an1 of us -- 2hen he chooses, he stri3es li3e athunder&olt!!! though he often saunters, in the manner of his time, this is al2a1s somethingthere!

Comentariile lui ! e2ton despre P!L! Fandel'

;ir saac e2ton (%6


46/49

E! Johnson a dovedit ca ?ulgata nu a fost pu&licata4reali#ata cel putin pana in anul %600 e!n!, sica ;inodul de la >rento (%5oc51ras, Cetatea @l&a), departe de 60 de ore, ca si cand ar fi in apropiere! ar pe dealurile din jurse vad urme de cai, de caini si de pasari, imprimate in stanci, in numar asa de mare ca si cand arfi trecut pe acolo o oaste imensa de calareti![

n mod uimitor, ceea ce "imitrie Cantemir ne spune este ca nu e*ista CBD+BD@ la suprafatapamantului intre Cetatea @l&a si ?arful >oaca, pe o distanta de peste /00 de 3m!

&stacolul vi#ual intre cele doua puncte de reper ar masura peste < 3m pe un pamant de formasferica!

Mai multe detalii aici, cifre precise'

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%5H0%50Gmsg%5H0%50

BM@ C@, pe un pamant cu suprafata plana, miscarea de precesie se datorea#a deplasarii;oarelui, spre vest, cu apro*imativ /,%ropicul Dacului si cel al Capricornului (ve#i harta din lin3ul de mai jos), inseamna cae*istenta istorica a lui "imitrie Cantemir la inceput de secol I? este datata complet gresit'"escriptio Moldaviae este o lucrarea alcatuita la sfarsit de secol I?!

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%65%57


47/49

@tunci cand mormantul atri&uit lui ;tefan cel Mare a fost deshumat, a fost descoperit un cadavrumisterios, ase#at pe %/ &are de fier, ingropat modest, fara sicriu, doar faptul ca istoricii au fostvrajiti de cronologia oficiala, i-a oprit sa-si dea seama ca acel cadavru a fost ase#at acolo, cu un

anumit scop!

Cel putin in ca#ul manastirii utna, arheologii romani si-au dat seama ca ;tema Moldovei nu afost deloc conceputa si reali#ata in %@EI@C> unde sa sape in %H..' mormantul atri&uit lui >utan3hamon a fost pregatit in gra&a cucateva #eci de ani inainte!

o2, as an e*ample, 2e can understand that Fo2ard Carter 3ne2 e*actl1 2here to dig &ac3 in%H.., as >utan3hamunTs tom& had &een prepared in a haste just a fe2 decades earlier, in order tofool the entire 2orld as to the antiVuit1 of Eg1pt!

n fact, modern researchers 2ere stunned 2hen the1 investigated the tom&'

222!mediaupdate!co!#a4=";tor155006

?isiting >utan3hamunYs tom&, aunton and his team ta3e in the ancient pharaohYs hapha#ard&urial site! :ith little decoration, modest si#e and a&sence of esoteric te*t, the tom& hardl1 feelsfit for a 3ing! Even more unusual, Sing >utan3hamunYs famous death mas3 seems to have &eenhastil1 fashioned from a 2omanYs headdress!

;ee also' the2a*conspirac1!com4pulp4the-tutan3hamun-deception (detalii din cartea cu acelasinume a lui P! TLarrell)

Bn alt personaj faimos al secolului I? este, desigur, eonard Euler!

n istoria falsificata, ondon Do1al ;ociet1, +! Lran3lin, ! Euler si chiar apoleon sunt deacord cu reforma PregorianaQ asa cum am va#ut conform formulei lui Pauss (cea mai precisadatare astronomica) ;inodul de la iceea nu putea avea loc inainte de anul $76-$77 e!n!, ceea ceinseamna ca asa numita reforma Pregoriana a fost complet inventata cel putin doua secole maitar#iu (o confirmare a dove#ilor pre#entate de Christoph fister, care indica ca Denasterea s-a
http://www.putna.ro/Stema-Moldovei-s3-ss6-c2-cc1.phphttp://www.putna.ro/Stema-Moldovei-s3-ss6-c2-cc1.phphttp://www.mediaupdate.co.za/?IDStory=55006http://thewaxconspiracy.com/pulp/the-tutankhamun-deceptionhttp://www.putna.ro/Stema-Moldovei-s3-ss6-c2-cc1.phphttp://www.putna.ro/Stema-Moldovei-s3-ss6-c2-cc1.phphttp://www.mediaupdate.co.za/?IDStory=55006http://thewaxconspiracy.com/pulp/the-tutankhamun-deception


48/49

petrecut cel putin dupa %7/0 e!n!)!

o2 the most precise proof that the 2or3s attri&uted to Euler 2ere created 2ell after %750 @"!

n EulerTs time, Dussia still used the Julian calendar! Fis correspondents in the rest of Europemostl1 used the ne2er Pregorian calendar, so 2hen it 2as ovem&er %., %7/H, it 2as alread1ovem&er ./ in +erlin! Eighteenth centur1 mail services 2ere much &etter than most people2ould e*pect, so occasionall1 it 2as possi&le for a letter to seem to &e ans2ered &efore it had&een 2ritten` :e ma3e note of these calendar pro&lems 2henever the1 arise!

Fo2 could eonhard EulerTs calculations(%7DE E!

t is clear, then, that the conspirators 2ho fa&ricated the 2or3s attri&uted to Euler, e2ton,agrange, Lermat!!! offerred to the pu&lic false Easter rules, not having at their disposal PaussTEaster formula!

o European countr1 or astronomer (Euler included) could have possi&l1 adopted the Pregorian

calendar reformation in the period %5$.-%$00, given the a&solute fact that the 2inter solsticemust have falled on "ecem&er %6 in the 1ear %5$. @", and not at all on "ecem&er %% (officialchronolog1)'

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!%577!htmlGmsg%


49/49

Lalsificarea cronologiei Devolutiei @mericane'

222!theflatearthsociet1!org4forum4inde*!!!!sg%6

iisus a fost crucificat la constantinopole si nu la ierusalim - partea iii

Documents