ROMN

CENTURA DE SIGURAN - MOFT SAU NEVOIE?

Invenia despre care se spune c a salvat milioane de viei de la prima sa utilizare a mplinit 50 de ani. Omul care a adus centura de siguran n main a fost inginerul suedez Nils Bohlin. O ntmplare tragic, n care una dintre rudele preedintelui firmei Volvo a murit n accident i-a dat lui Bohlin posibilitatea de a dezvolta un sistem nou i eficace n ceea ce privete sigurana ocupanilor unei maini.Conform legislaiei n vigoare toi pasagerii unui autovehicul, inclusiv cei de pe bancheta din spate, trebuie s poarte centura de siguran. Experii n siguran auto au calculat c ansele de supravieuire n caz de accident cresc cu peste 50% n cazul purtrii centurii de siguran. Cu toate acestea, un studiu IMAS arat c la noi exist prejudecata c nu e nevoie de centur, ntruct din cauza aglomeraiei se circul ncet i pericolele sunt mai mici, dar se omite c mare parte din accidente au loc n mediul urban.tii ce se poate ntmpla dac nu avei montat centura de siguran? n timpul unui impact, la 50 km/h, viteza de deplasare n ora, asupra unui adult de 80 kg acioneaz o for de 2 tone. n acest caz, asupra unui copil revine o lovitur cu fora de 500 kg. Pentru pasagerii din spate care nu i-au pus centurile de siguran, o astfel de lovitur este foarte periculoas. Ei se pot lovi de podul mainii, iar pasagerul din mijloc, n general , zboar prin parbriz. Dar dac efectele utilizrii centurii de siguran sunt benefice, de ce nu toat lumea poart centura? Printre oferi circul mituri potrivit crora centura este periculoas pentru c te mpiedic s iei din main n cazul unui accident, c ifoneaz hainele, c este incomod i c airbag-ul ofer suficient protecie. Cu toate acestea, coliziunile sunt periculoase chiar i la viteze mici . Un impact la 40 km/h supune corpul uman la presiuni similare cu o cdere de la etajul trei al unei cldiri. Astfel, pentru a-i contientiza pe conductorii auto, dar i pe pasageri cu privire la riscurile la care se expun prin neportul centurii de siguran, poliitii din cadrul Serviciului Rutier Vlcea desfoar periodic activiti preventive n acest sens pe toate drumurile din jude.Chiar dac nu este n mod direct o cauz care genereaz accidentele rutiere, portul/neportul centurii de siguran crete/scade riscul de supravieuire n cazul unui accident.

MITURI DESPRE CENTURILE DE SIGURAN

1. Centura l deranjeaz pe ocupantul scaunului la care e ataat Muli oferi sau pasageri motiveaz nefolosirea centurii prin faptul c i-ar deranja. Ei bine, centura de siguran deranjeaz mai puin dect cureaua de la pantaloni. Centura de siguran se poate regla pe nlime n multe autoturisme i poate fi ntins n aa fel nct s nu l strng pe ocupantul scaunului. n plus, disconfortul unui accident amplificat de nefolosirea centurii este infinit mai mare dect eventualul disconfort cauzat de centura de siguran.

2. Centur poart doar "fraierii"Un capt de centur de siguran, care se cupleaz n mecanismul de prindere al centurii, l-ar face pe respectivul conductor auto s circule linitit fr centur, beep-urile enervante care atenioneaz necuplarea centurii fiind dezactivate.Mai exist o categorie: cei care fixeaz centura prin spatele scaunului. Se evit astfel declanarea acelorai beep-uri, dar n acelai timp nu se folosete centura. Ei bine, probabilitatea ca o astfel de persoan s o peasc ntr-un accident este mult mai mare dect n cazul "fraierilor" care folosesc centura.

3. n taxi nu se folosete centura "Mi s-a ntmplat de nenumrate ori ca n momentul n care mi fixam centura dup ce urcam n taxi, oferul s-mi spun binevoitor: nu e nevoie s v punei centura. Recent chiar am avut o discuie cu cineva, pentru c se aezase n locul din dreapta fa i nu i cupla centura pe motiv c nu e nevoie. Fals! Pe lng faptul c doar oferii de taxi nu sunt obligai s poarte centura de siguran (aberant, de asemenea), centura ar trebui purtat n interesul propriu, nu pentru c suntem sau nu obligai s o facem. Eu folosesc ntotdeauna centura n taxi, de cele mai multe ori spre uimirea oferului." - relateaz un pasager.

4. Pentru locurile din spate nu se folosete centura Procentul celor care folosesc la noi centura de siguran pe bancheta din spate este unul derizoriu. oferul care permite pasagerilor din spate s nu poarte centura, ar trebui s fie contient c i el se supune unui risc mrit din aceast cauz. n cazul unui impact sever, pasagerii din spate care nu folosesc centura, pot fi aruncai i provoca rni grave celor din fa, chiar daca acetia poart centura . Pn la urm, legea lui Newton spune c un obiect n micare va rmne n micare atta vreme ct asupra lui nu acioneaz o for extern. n cazul unui pasager fr centur, acea for extern poate fi parbrizul, stlpii mainii, bordul mainii sau chiar un alt pasager din interior. Nu ar fi de preferat ca fora extern s fie chiar centura?

5. In ora nu ai nevoie s foloseti centura Motivaia aici e pe ct de simpl, pe att de fals: n ora nu se circul cu vitez, aa c nu e nevoie s se poarte centurile de siguran . Ei bine, o persoan de 70 de kg este proiectat cu o for de 2,6 tone n cazul unui impact la 50 de km/h. Destul de mult, nu-i aa?

6. Daca esti un ofer atent, nu ai nevoie de centur Greit! n 35% din accidentele mortale, cel decedat s-a dovedit a fi i cel vinovat. n plus, exist o mulime de oferi neateni n jur, care pot provoca accidente, n ciuda tuturor precauiilor tale.

7. n caz de accident, e mai greu sa iei din main sau s fi scos din main dac ai centur Complet fals. Dimpotriv, purtarea centurii sporete exponenial ansele de a rmne contient n cazul unui impact puternic i de a putea prsi n siguran autovehiculul.8. Nu merg departe, aa c nu mai are rost s mi mai pun centura Greit, 30% din accidente au loc la mai puin de 15 km de cas.

9. Mai bine in copilul n brae dect s-l fixez cu centura de siguran sau n scaunul de copii Greit! La un impact petrecut la 50 km/h, un copil de 25 kg este proiectat n fa cu o ton for. Este imposibil c fora muscular a braelor tale s fie de ajuns pentru a-l menine n siguran.

10. Maina mea are airbag-uri, nu mai am nevoie de centur Airbag-urile sunt proiectate s funcioneze optim numai mpreun cu centura de siguran. Ba chiar n anumite situaii, dac nu este purtat centura, airbag-urile pot s nu se declaneze sau s provoace rni serioase dac se declaneaz. O statistic suplimentar, care ar trebui s dea de gndit oricui: unul din trei oameni va suferi rni serioase ntr-un accident auto de-a lungul vieii lui. Practic, accidentele auto sunt una din cauzele principale ale deceselor provocate de factori externi. Da, accidentele auto, nu rzboiul, nu prbuirea avioanelor, nu cutremurele, nu epidemiile, etc. Nu ar fi mai bine dac am ncerca s ne protejm n eventualitatea (destul de mare) a unui accident?

ENGLEZ

Seat belts - WHIM OR NEED?

The invention which is said to have saved millions of lives since its first use has reached 50 years. The man who brought the seat belt in the car was the engineer Nils Bohlin Swedish. A tragic accident in which one of the president's relatives died in the accident Volvo company gave Bohlin opportunity to develop a new and effective in terms of safety of the occupants of a car.Under the legislation all the passengers of a vehicle, including those in the back seat must wear a seat belt. Auto safety experts have calculated that the chances of survival in an accident increases by 50% when wearing the safety belt. However, IMAS study shows that there is bias in our belt there's no need because of congestion is moving slowly and dangers are smaller but omits that most of the accidents occur in urban areas.You know what can happen if you have installed seat belts? During an impact at 50 km / h, speed in town, on an adult of 80 kg acting a force of 2 tons. In this case, a child rests on a shot by force of 500 kg. For rear passengers who do not put their seat belts, such a blow is very dangerous. They can hit the bridge the car and the passenger in the middle, generally flying through the windshield. But if the effects are beneficial use safety belts, why not everyone wearing a seat?Some drivers myths circulating that the belt is dangerous because it prevents you out of the car in an accident that clothes wrinkle that is uncomfortable and airbag provide sufficient protection. However, even dangerous collisions at low speeds. An impact at 40 km / h human body subject to similar pressures with a fall from the third floor of a building. Thus, to realize the drivers but also passengers on the risks posed to the non-bearing belt, officers from the Service Road Valcea periodic preventive activities conducted in this regard on all roads in the county.While not directly a cause that generates traffic accidents, port / non-bearing belt increases / decreases the risk of survival in a crash.MYTHS ABOUT BELTS

1. occupant seat belt bothers him that is attachedMany drivers or passengers not using seat motivated by the fact that they would bother. Well, seatbelt mind less than trouser belt. The belt is adjustable in height in many cars and can be spread in a way that does not raise the seat occupant. In addition, amplified by failing discomfort of an accident the belt is infinitely greater than the possible discomfort caused by the seat belt.

2. belt wearing only "suckers"One end of the belt, which engages the belt clamping mechanism, it would cause the driver to travel unrestrained quiet, annoying beeps to warn necuplarea belt is disabled.There is another category: those that secure the seat belt behind. It avoids triggering the same beep, but while the belt is not used. Well, the likelihood of such a person to get hurt in an accident is much higher than the "suckers" who use the belt.

3. taxi belt is not used"It happened many times that when I fix the belt after climbing the taxi driver willing to tell me: no need to put your seat belt on. Recently we even had a conversation with someone, because she sat down in front passenger seat belt not engage because its not needed. False Besides just taxi drivers are not required to wear seat belts (aberrant, too), the belt should be worn interest, not or because we are not obliged to do so. I always use taxi belt, most often to the amazement of the driver. " - Tells a passenger.

4. Rear seat belt is not usedThe percentage of those who use us seatbelt in the backseat is ridiculous. The driver that allows rear seat passengers to wear seat not, it should be aware that he is subject to a heightened risk of this. In the event of a severe impact, rear passengers not using seat belt may be thrown and cause severe injuries to the front, even if they wear the belt. Eventually, Newton's law says that an object in motion will remain in motion as long as the external force of not acting. If an unrestrained passenger, the external force may be windscreen pillars car, dashboard or even another passenger inside. It would be preferable if the external force to be really belt?

5. In the city you do not need to use beltThe motivation here is as simple as it is false: the city no expressways, so no need to wear seatbelts. Well, a person of 70 kg is designed with a force of 2.6 tons in case of a crash at 50 km / h. Pretty much, is not it?

6. If you are a careful driver, you do not need beltWrong! In 35% of fatal accidents, the deceased proved to be guilty. In addition, there is a lot of careless drivers around that can cause accidents, despite all your precautions.

7. In case of accident, it's harder to get out of the car or to be removed from the machine if you ringCompletely false. Conversely, wearing the belt exponentially increases chances of staying aware in case of an impact and can leave the vehicle safely.8. Do not go away, so not much point I still put the beltWrong, 30% of accidents occur at less than 15 km from home.

9. Better keep her child than to fix a seat belt or child seatWrong! The impact occurred at 50 km / h, a child of 25 kg is designed to force a ton. It is impossible that your muscular arms be enough to keep him safe.

10. My car has airbags, belt no longer needAirbags are designed to work optimally with only a seatbelt. Even in certain situations, if not worn belt, the airbags may not trigger or cause serious injury if not fire.An additional statistic which should give pause to anyone: one in three people will suffer serious injuries in a car accident along his life. Basically, traffic accidents are a major cause of deaths caused by external factors. Yes, auto accidents, not war, not the crashes, no earthquakes, no epidemics, etc. Would not it be better if we try to protect ourselves in the event (quite large) an accident?