nicole andersson architecture portfolio

01|13N I C O L E

A N D E R S S O N

A R C H I T E C T U R A L D E S I G N E R

E D U C A T I O N

E X P E R I E N C E

V O L U N T E E R

S K I L L S

A S S O C I A T I O N S

Washington Univers i t y in St . Lou is

Ba che l o r o f A r t s i n A rch i t e c tu re , M ino r i n Modern Dance , GPA 3 .6 0 December ‘0 9

Soc iedad Centra l De Acqui tectos

Study Abroad in Bueno s A i res , A rgen t i na Fa l l ‘ 0 9

Washington Univers i t y in St . Lou is , TA Susta inab le Des ign Januar y ‘0 9 - June ‘09

Ass i s ted in exp la in ing sus ta inab le des ign so lu t i ons to s tuden t g roups des ign ing a Ch i l d ren ’ s Lea rn ing Cen te r s i t ed in No r th St . Lou i s . Prov ided

l o g i s t i ca l suppo r t t o p ro fesso rs and met w i th s tuden ts i nd i v i dua l l y t o g i ve add i t i ona l ass i s tance in p ro je c t deve l open t .

Alber t i , Arch i tecture for Ch i ldren , Vo lunteer St . Lou is , M O Januar y ‘0 9 - June ‘09

Gu ided e l emen ta r y schoo l ch i l d ren th rough week l y a rch i t e c tu re p ro je c t s cen te red a round sus ta inab le des ign .

After Schoo l Ar t for Ch i ldren , Vo lunteer St . Lou is , M O Januar y ‘0 6 - June ’06

Phinney Des ign Group , Jun ior Des igner Saratoga Spr ings , NY May ‘07 - November ‘12 Des ign p ro je c t s ; p resen t des ign concep ts t o c l i en t s , l ead p ro je c t s th rough concep tua l t o cons t ruc t i on documents and eng inee r ing coo rd ina t i on

Deve l op Mas te r P lan Repo r t s ; ou t l i ne des ign app roa ch and goa l s , ex i s t i ng cond i t i ons and p rog ram ana l ys i s , p ropo sed p ro je c t des igns and o rde r

o f magn i tude co s t . Rende r a rch i t e c tu ra l i l l us t r a t i ons ; u t i l i ze mu l t i p l e med iums fo r rep resen ta t i on o f p ropo sed and new cons t ruc t i on p ro je c t s .

Mi ldred Lane Kemper Ar t Museum, Ass is tant Reg is t rar St . Lou is December ‘0 6 - June ‘08

Organ i zed museum da tabase and ve r i f i ed A r two rk mate r i a l , da te , and a r t i s t b i o g raph ies . Pe r fo rmed resoné ve r i f i ca t i on o f A r two rk o r i g in .

Danfoss F lomat ic Co . Ass is tant Market ing D i rector , G lens Fa l l s , NY May ‘05 - August ‘0 6

F i lmed , sc r i p ted and ed i t ed p roduc t v ide o s as new med ia marke t i ng s t r a tegy . Pho tog raphed and ed i t ed p roduc t images used in marke t i ng l i t e ra tu re

and company webs i t e .

I l l us t r a t i ons : 3D : Rev i t 2012 , Rh in o 5 .0 , VRay , Au toCAD 2012 , Goog le Ske tch Up 2D : Marke r , Pen , Penc i l , Wate rco l o r , Ac r yc l i c and O i l Pa in tAdobe Su i t e : Adobe Pho to shop , I l l us t r a to r , I nDes ign M ic ro so f t O f f i ce : Word , Exce l , Powerpo in t Languages : Span i sh

Green Bu i l d ing Ce r t i f i ca t i on Ins t i t u te

LE ED Green Assoc ia t i on s ince Feb rua r y ‘12

NCARB ( I DP Expe r i ence : 4 ,327/ 6 ,000 h rs . comp le te )

ASA I Amer i can Soc ie t y o f A rch i t e c tu ra l I l l us t r a to r s (Member s ince November ‘11)

Yoga A l l i ance Ce r t i f i ed Yoga Ins t ruc to r (Ce r t i f i ed Augus t ‘12)

N I C O L E A N D E R S S O Nn i c o l e . m . a n d e r s s o n @ g m a i l . c o m 5 18 . 4 9 6 . 2 3 8 7

“Wh i l e one can th ink o f an answer , i t i s on l y th rough

a c t i on tha t we come to rea l i ze a des ign so lu t i on .

A rch i t e c tu re as a c t i on d i s rup ts a p re conce i ved

no t i on o f a rch i t e c tu re as a s ta t i c sub je c t ; a r i g id

se t o f s t ruc tu ra l ru l es , co lumns and l i nes . We a re in

mot i on and so , t o o , a re ou r bu i l d ings . I be l i e ve tha t

a rch i t e c tu re i s the u l t ima te a r t f o rm , commanded by ou r

c i v i c respons ib i l i t y t o th o se inhab i t i ng and en l i ven ing

the spa ces we des ign . I be l i e ve we a re he re no t t o

change ou rse l ves , bu t ra the r the wor ld a round us .“

G R E E N R O O F G U E S T A D D I T I O NFa l l 2011

Jackson , NY Pro ject Des igner at PD G

Pro ject Team: Andrew A l l i son (Manager)

The unde rg round 1 ,5 00 SF gues t add i t i on to an ex i s t i ng one-s to r y house min im ized the impa c t o f the s t ruc tu re th rough the deve l opment o f a usab le g reen ro o f spa ce , u l t ima te l y o f f - se t t i ng the to ta l deve l oped su r fa ce a rea . S i t i ng o f the add i t i on resu l t ed in a topog raph ic s tudy as the ex i s t i ng res idence res ted a l ong a p re c ip i t ous l andscape .

i . Study ske tches de te rm ined c r i t i ca l t opog raph ic l i nes re l a t i ve t o the ex i s t i ng founda t i on and basement f l o o r , sugges t i ng the a l l owab le ex tens i on o f the p ropo sed unde rg round s t ruc tu re f r om the ex i s t i ng l ower l e ve l .

i i . Ex te r i o r ske tch pe rspec t i ves s tud ied the v i sua l and sys temat i c impa c t o f the unde rg round add i t i on and g reen roo f .

I N T E R

01

1

i. ii.

2

P R O F E S S I O N A L { r e s i d e n t i a l }

i i i . Op t i on 1 p ropo ses an unde rg round add i t i on as a connec-t i on to the unde ru t i l i zed l ower l e ve l . Pro je c t i on o f re ta in ing wa l l s re - r i en t the spa ce towards v i ews to the h i l l ed l andscape beyond . i v . Op t i on 2 sugges ts an above g round ex te r i o r de ta ched gues t spa ce to be connec ted th rough re - l andscap ing o f the ex te r i o r ba ck pa t i o .v . Op t i on 3 connec ts the ex i s t i ng house to an above g round gues t ro om th rough a g lass co r r i do r .

Oppo s i t e page : Lower Leve l P lan : Op t i on 1 p resen ts the mos t i nven t i ve and sus ta inab le des ign so lu t i on . Add ing a gues t ro om and ba th ( l i gh t g ray ) t o the l ower l e ve l r ea c t i va tes the unused ex i s t i ng l ower l e ve l (da rk g ray ) a l l ow ing fo r remode l i ng in to add i t i ona l l i v i ng spa ce . The p lan gene ra tes a usuab le g reen ro o f ga rden above , m in im iz ing deve l opment o f impermeab le su r fa ce and inc reas ing l andscap ing fo r ou tdoo r en te r t a inmen t . iii.

iv.

v.

3

P A V I L I O N

02

5

L A K E S I D E R E S I D E N C EFa l l 2011

Lake George , NYPro ject Des igner at PD G

Pro ject Team: Michae l Ph inney (Manager) Jon Haynes (Job Capta in)

Des igned to f i t w i th in the fo op r in t o f an ex i s t i ng co t t age , the l akes ide Pa v i l i on Res idence min im izes s i t e impa c t . Pro je c t i on o f the ro o f p l ane towards the l akes ide gene ra tes a doub le he igh t spa ce l i v i ng spa ce , as p re - fab t imber s t ruc tu res a re eng inee red to a l l ow fo r an immense cu r ta in wa l l sys tem to ma x im ize v i ews towards the wa te r .

i . A rende red e l eva t i on concep t i l l us t r a tes bu i l d ing p ropo r -t i ons and mate r i a l i t y . As an in te rp l ay be tween sma l l and l a rge pa v i l i ons , r o o f he igh ts and s t ruc tu ra l sys tems a re re -o rde red to seamless l y l i nk sys tems w i th a g l as co r r i do r .


i.

6


ii.

iii.

7

i i . - i i i . E l e va t i on ske tches reso l ved an exchange be tween ve r t i ca l members (ch imney , w indow mu l l i ons ) and ho r i -zon ta l members ( l ouv res , r o o f ) , u l t ima te l y de te rm in ing the p lan l ay ou t and d imens i on ing o f s t ruc tu ra l member he igh ts i n sec t i on . i v . De ta i l ed bu i l d ing sec t i on

M A S T E R P L A N

03

9

N Y R ASpr ing 2011 - Fa l l 2012

Saratoga Spr ings , NYPro ject Des igner at PD G

Pro ject Team: Michae l Ph inney , Andrew A l l i son , Tara Borod in (pro ject managers)

The NYRA (New Yo rk Ra c ing Assoc ia t i on ) mas te r p l an inc ludes the renova t i on and rehab i l i t a t i on o f h i s t o r i c s t ruc tu res a t the Sa ra toga Ra ce Tra ck . Be ing the o ldes t spo r t s venue in the coun t r y , the t r a ck has unde rgone con t i nuous renova t i on and upgrades to sus ta in re l e vance in to the 21s t cen tu r y . Howeve r , on l y now i s the re a cohes i ve mas te r p l an wh ich examines ope ra t i ona l , p rog rammat i c and s t ruc tu ra l / sys temat i c en t i t i e s a c ro ss the en t i r e f a c i l i t y a t one t ime . The a rch i t e c tu ra l componen t o f the mas te r p l an cons i s ted o f re -p rog ramming key ope ra t i ona l depa r tmen ts . Depa r tmen ta l r e l o ca t i ons were de te rm ined th rough compar i son o f ex i s t i ng to p ropo sed a reas . Ons i t e su r veys revea led the op-po r tun i t i es f o r p rog rammat i c re o rgan i za t i on and des ign imp lemen ta t i ons .

P R O F E S S I O N A L { m a s t e r p l a n }

i.

ii.

10

Re-programming of the C lubhouse began as an inves t i ga t i on o f ex i s t i ng spa ces and to ta l a l l owab le p rog ram fo r expans i on . Remova l o f unnecessa r y ba ck o f h ouse spa ces a l l owed fo r the expans i on o f pub l i c venues , u l t ima te l y re - in t r o duc ing and ma in ta in ing the in teg r i t y o f the o r i g ina l 1928 s t ruc tu re . i . Ex i s t i ng C lubhouse Leve l D : Due to the l a ck o f p re -ex i s t i ng as-bu i l t d raw ings , s i t e su r veys o f ove ra l l d imens i ons and es t ima ted a reas were ca lcu la ted to de te rm ine p rog rammat i c remova l s and add i t i ons . i i . Propo sed : Expans i on o f h o sp i t a l i t y spa ce i s pe rmi t t ed by the d i scove r y and p ropo sed re -des ign o f unused ro o f spa ce .


iii.

iv.

11

i . Ex i s t i ng C lubhouse Pa t i o : On-s i t e su r ve r y revea led oppo r tun i t i es f o r expans i on o f h o sp i t a l i t y and res tau ran t venue spa ces . i i . Propo sed : New ve r t i ca l c i r cu la t i on co res red i s t r i bu ted ma in pa ths and en t rances in to p ropo sed sea t i ng and res tau ran t , and remova l o f unused p rog rams rede f i n i ed and re ta ined the in teg r i t y o f the h i s to r i c s t ruc tu re .


v.

vi.

12

Modi f icat ions to the Grandstand/ Carouse l r e vea l the h i s to r i c s t ruc tu re and th rough the rep rog ramming o f b o th gues t and ope ra t i ona l p rog rams . i . Propo sed ske tch : The g round f l o o r o f the Grands tand fea tu res the 1981 ca rouse l s t ruc tu re a re mean t t o be repu rpo sed f r om sea t i ng in to a l a rge res tau ran t venue . Us ing ex i s t i ng d raw ings , l ay ou ts f o r the res tau ran ts were d i s t r i bu ted based upon ex i s t i ng co lumn g r id l i nes and p ropo sed a x i s o f c i r cu la t i on , i n to and th rough the Grands tand . i i . Propo sed : F ina l d raw ings o f the p ropo sed ca rouse l demons t ra te a c l ea r l i ne o f c i r cu la t i on th rough and a round ma jo r p rog rammat i c i n te r ven t i ons , i nc lud ing se r v i ce and ve r t i ca l c i r cu la t i on .


P R O G R A M M I N G

04

13

p r o d u c t R E - P R O G R A M M I N GSpr ing 2012

Saratoga Spr ings , NY Pro ject Des igner at PD G

Pro ject Team: Michae l Ph inney (Pro ject manager)Jace Brown

Produc t re -p rog ramming was an exe rc i se to p romote e f f i c i ency and g rowth w i th in the bus iness , i den t i f i ed as a se t o f oppo r tun i t i es and cons t ra in t s i nhe ren t i n a new bu i l d ing p lan . Ca lcu la t i on o f ex i s t i ng v o lumet r i c s to rage reveaed a reas fo r expans i on and conso l i da t i on o f p rog ram. Fo r the pu rpo se o f s t ruc tu r i ng the feas ib i l i t y s tudy , the bu i l d ing p rog ram was o rgan i zed in to seven ma in p rog rammat i c t ypes ; Re ta i l , Warehous ing , Admin i s t r a t i on/Sa les , Suppo r t , Pro cess ing , Rece i v i ng/Pre-pa ck ing/P ick ing/Sh ipp ing and

P R O F E S S I O N A L { m a s t e r p l a n }14

i . Ex i s t i ng Work F l ow: Re-p rog ramming o f ope ra t i ons began w i th on-s i t e obse r va t i on o f ex i s t i ng work f l ows , i den t i f i ed by l im i t a t i ons o f the sepa ra t i on o f spa ces a c ro ss d i s t i nc t and d i spa ra te bu i l d ings on the ex i s t i ng bu i l d ing s i t e .i i . Op t im ized Work F l ow and Prog ram A l l o ca t i on : Deve l opment o f an a l t e rna t i ve work f l ow fo r imp lemen ta t i on in a new fa c i l i t y p ropo sed app rop r i a te s i z i ng and e f f i c i en t ad ja cenc ies o f p rog rams .i i i . Pre -schemat i c A rch i t e c tu ra l Prog ram D iag ram: To fu r the r v i sua l i ze the p ropo sed work f l ow , a sca led d iag ram concep t demons t ra tes an op t im ized fa c i l i t y .

11Betterbee Programming and Feasibility Study Report May 2012

Existing Workflow 2.4Existing workflow is limited by the separation of spaces across distinct and disparate buildings on the site. These secluded spac-es segregate the administrative/sales offices from the majority of business operations. Employees (green arrows in figure 2.4.i below) are forced to travel through the lower level of the main barn warehouse and the “books” storage area in order to reach the main warehouse and shipping area, creating an indirect and relatively long travel distance from the front receiving portion of the building to the back shipping area.

WORKFLOW OBSERVATIONS: The storage connector space (labeled “books” in the diagram 2.4.i below) bisects facility operations into upper and lower zones; the upper is centralized around the Barn Warehouse, and the lower is centralized around the Main Warehouse. An exterior view of this physical separation of warehousing spaces can be seen in fig-ure 2.2.iv on page 08.

Minor spaces are sattelites of these two centralized storage areas (such as the honey house, woodshop, learning center, pre-pack), and create dead end flows in and out of the connected spaces. Demand for more storage space has been resolved by adding large storage areas in separate buildings, where product smust move inside and outside for temporary storage. Products to be “pre-packed” must move into the pre-pack room off of the lower level barn and then back into corresponding storage spaces.

Customers visiting Betterbee go into the front retail store and then outside to the bargain barn. Staff have a close adjacency and access to the front store to assist customers. However, the employee travel path to the other end of the warehouse is quite extended through the series of storage spaces.

figure 2.4.i Existing Workflow Diagram

Processing (Honey House/Hives/Wood shop)

Exterior Spaces

Incoming Product

Outgoing Product

Customer/Staff Circulation

Major Product Input/Output

Hives4,000 S.F. Honey House

1,064 S.F.

Wood Shop1,131 S.F.

Quonset Building3,588 S.F.

Main Warehouse2,000 S.F.

Learning Center893 S.F.

Picking/Shipping893 S.F.

AdministrationSales

1,124 S.F.

Retail580 S.F.

BargainBarn

376 S.F.

Shed495 S.F.

Pre-Pack

350 S.F.

Rec.228 S.F.

Incoming Material

Outgoing Product

Outgoing Product

Sup.208 S.F.

Books180 S.F.

Hot Room

252 S.F.

Sup.90 S.F.

Lower Level Barn2,706 S.F.

Shipping Containers3,645 S.F.

Second Level Barn1,995 S.F.

Learning Center

Warehousing

Receiving/Pre-packing/Picking/Shipping

Administration/Sales

Retail

Support

16 Betterbee Programming and Feasibility Study May 2012

3.2 Optimized Workflow Diagram

figure 3.1.i Optimized Workflow Diagram with Specified Program Allocation and SF

This diagram combines the spatial requirements of the Program Table (Fig. 3.1.i) as well as the workflow requirements of the three core functions (Fig. 3.0.i) to illustrate an optimized work-flow diagram. Dissecting the existing Betterbee facility into its constituent program components and having re-organized those parts into a clearer and more cohesive workflow analysis, an op-timized workflow diagram, below, begins to emerge.

The new diagram suggests not only space requirements for each program, but also the adjacencies necessary for an efficient op-eration which reduces travel distances, encourages collabora-tion where appropriate, and segregates customer encounters from secure areas.

WORKFLOW DIAGRAM: Also suggested is the importance of the overlapping areas where core-functions interface. Below, these overlapped areas are strictly defined in contrast to the existing Betterbee facility where a undisciplined overlap of the unnecessarily complex ar-rangement of spaces results in too many requirements for any one space to effectively handle.

Processing (Honey House/Hives/Wood shop)

Exterior Spaces

Incoming Product

Outgoing Product

Customer/Staff Circulation

Learning Center

Warehousing

Receiving/Pre-packing/Picking/Shipping

Administration/Sales

Retail

Support

Major Product Input/Output

Warehouse33,000 S.F.

Retail Warehouse5,000 S.F.

Apiary4,000 S.F.

Pre-pack8000 S.F.

Order-Assembly8000 S.F.

Shipping8000 S.F.

Administration/Sales2,400 S.F.

Support500 S.F.

Support500 S.F.

Retail1,200 S.F.

Learning Center

1,200 S.F.

Cafe1,200 S.F.

Bee Museum1,200 S.F.

“Customer Experience”

“Product”

“Administration”

“Production and Logistics”

Receiving8000 S.F.

Lumber Storage/Manufacturing

4,000 S.F.

Finishing Shop1,200 S.F.

Incoming Wood Products Incoming Honey

Products

Outdoing Retail Products

Outdoing Online/Call Orders

Incoming Materials

Honey House1,200 S.F.

Inventory Checkpoint

17Betterbee Programming and Feasibility Study Report May 2012

Building Diagram and Architectural Requirements 3.3

figure 3.3.i Pre-Schematic Architectural Workflow and Program Diagram

BUILDING DIAGRAM:In addition to embodying the workflow diagram in Section 3.2 and the site requirements identified in Section 3.6, the final facil-ity design must conform with certain architectural requirements raised by the Building Code of New York State, the Environmen-tal Conservation Code of New York State, Local Building codes, and be implemented by readily available labor and materials in a cost effective manner. The diagram below (Fig.3.6.i) illustrates a combination of these requirements into a possible arrangement.

The final arrangement may vary significantly in terms of design while still conforming to the above criteria.

Most critical among the spaces depicted below is the warehouse. Here, the possible cost effective arrangements are most limited and have the greatest impact upon the final facility design.

Warehouse36,000 S.F.

Retail Warehouse5,000 S.F.

Apiary4,000 S.F.

Possible Expansion of Warehousing

Pre-pack3,600 S.F.

Order-Assembly800 S.F.

Shipping800 S.F.

Administration2,500 S.F.

Support800 S.F.

Retail1,250 S.F.

Learning Center

1,250 S.F.

Receiving800 S.F.

Lumber Storage/Manufacturing

4,000 S.F.

Finishing Shop

1,250 S.F.

Incoming Lumber

Incoming Honey Products

Bee Museum 2,500 S.F.

Parking for Bee Museum, Learning

Center, Cafe and Retail, and employee

parking

Additional Employee Parking for Fulfillment Staff

Cafe2,500 S.F.

Outdoing Retail Products

Outdoing Online/Call

Orders

Incoming Materials

Dumpster/ Recycling

Honey House

1,250 S.F.

A C A D E M I C

B U E N O S A I R E S

07

15

S T U D I O 4 1 1BU EN OS A I RES PU BL I C L I BRARY

Fal l 2009 Cr i t ic : Tr is tan D ieguez

The Pub l i c L ib ra r y p ro je c t i n teg ra ted in to the u rban fab r i c o f Bueno s A i res . Stud ies o f u rban con tex t revea led pa t t e rns in bu i l d ing e l eva t i on and dens i t i es . I n an e f f o r t t o nego t i a te bo th au tomob i l e and pedes t r i an t r a f f i c a t the c ro ss o f the c i t i es ma in s t r ee t s , Las He ras and Sca lab r in i , t he bu i l d ing ’ s f o o tp r i n t de te rm ined ex te r i o r c i r cu la t i on . The s i t e concep t above shows a f l ow o f t r a f f i c i n to and a round the “ l i b ra r y s ta ck co re” wh ich in tu rn p ro je c t s ba ck ou t i n to the c i t y , mak ing a v i sua l and phys ica l connec t i on w i th the ad ja cen t Pa le rmo Pa rk . Oppo s i t e page : Con tex tua l l i gh t p i xe l a t i on s tudy o f s t r ee t e l e va t i ons .

Le f t c l o ckw ise : E l eva t i on l i gh t p i xe l a t i on s tudy R igh t : Study ske tch mode l s

A C A D E M I C

i.

ii.

17

i . Bu i l d ing sec t i onsi i . Study mode l s i i i . F i na l 1:200 mode l

iii.

18

A C A D E M I C

N O L A

06

19

S T U D I O 3 1 2N O LA: Gut ter to Gu l f

Spr ing 2009 Cr i t ic : Derek Hoefer l in

As an inves t i ga t i on o f the wa te r i n f r as t ruc tu re (be tween gu t t e r and gu l f ) i n New Or l eans , the NOLA s tud i o f ound a reas fo r p romis ing des ign in te r ven t i on upon v i s i t i ng the c i t y . F ina l p ro je c t s were a rch i t e c tu ra l i n cha ra c te r , bu t spoke more to the soc ia l , po l i t i ca l and economic p rob lems unde r l y i ng the devas ta t i on o f Ka t r i na .

I . C i t y G roup Mode l : Mode l i n fo rma t i on inc luded s i x ma in t r ansec ts o f s tudy a c ro ss the c i t y , i den i t i f ca t i on o f pump s ta t i ons , cana l s , t r anspo r ta t i on l i nes , wa te r d ra inage sys tems , t opog raphy and r i ve r dep ths .

i i . Mode l Assemb ly Time l apse : The c i t y mode l was des igned as a “k i t o f pa r t s ” f o r t r anspo ra t i on to and f r om New Or l eans .

ii. i.

20

A C A D E M I C

i.

ii.

21

iii. 22

A f te r s tudy ing hous ing t ypo l og ies and ex i s t i ng ro o f and c i t y d ra inage sys tems , a p ropo sed res iden t i a l des ign p rov ided necessa r y v o lumet r i c ho ld ing con ta ine rs f o r 10 , 25 , and 100 yea r s to rms . In an e f f o r t t o embra ce and con t ro l the f l ow o f wa te r , r e -des igned gu t t e r sys tems d ra in wa te r th rough a se r i es o f ga rdens mean t t o s l ow the f l ow , u l t ima te l y , m in im iz ing s t ra in on the c i t y cana l sys tem. i . Bu i l d ing p lan : two d i s t i nc t h ouse w ings f l ank a cen te r ga rden f i l t r a t i on sys tem. i i . Bu i l d ing sec t i on : wa te r f l ow i s shown f rom gu t te r t o cana lway . Ra i s ing the house above sea l e ve l and c rea t i ng s tepp ings o f i n te rmed ia r y ga rden spa ces a l l ows fo r wa te r d ra inage to f l ow s l ow ly i n to the c i t y sys tem. i i i . Mode l

A C A D E M I C

P O O L

05

23

S T U D I O 3 1 1Corondo let Poo l St . Lou is , M O

Fa l l 2008Cr i t ic : Ia ian Fraser

A poo l cen te r i s s i t ed in a pub l i c pa rk , as a se r i es o f p ro je c t i on l i nes a c ro ss the topog raphy . The exe rc i se de te rm ined the o r i en ta t i on o f l a rge re ta in ing wa l l s t o the sou th , an a rch i t e c tu ra l o rde r wh ich bo th ma x im ized sun l i gh t , v i ews and in teg ra t i on in to the s l op ing s i t e . The monumenta l wa l l s became the de l i nea t i on be tween pub l i c and p r i va te spa ce , a c t i ng as a g round ing s t ruc tu ra l f o rm f rom wh ich ang led ro o f canop ies res t , a l l ow ing pene t ra t i on o f b o th l i gh t and c ro ss c i r cu la t i on .Oppo s i t e page : A concep t sec t i on d raw ing revea led the scu lp tu ra l cha ra c te r o f the poo l i n wh ich wa te r i s he ld , and l i gh t re f l e c ted .

A C A D E M I C

i.

ii.

ii.

26

Oppo s i t e page : Mode li . Bu i l d ing sec t i oni i . Bu i l d ing p lan i i i . Study sec t i on pe rspec t i ve

S K E T C H E S + R E N D E R I N G S

TR AV E L S K ETC H E S

i.

i.

27

Ske tch ing p roved a method by wh ich to unde rs tand a new u rban fab r i c and the a rch i t e c tu ra l ve rna cu la r s o f a new cu l tu re . The t r a ve l i ng s tud i o v i s i t ed ma jo r a rch i t e c tu ra l wo rks th rough ou t A rgen t i na , B raz i l , Ch i l e and Uruguay . The a c t i on o f ske tch ing p rov ided cohes i ve s tudy f r om wh ich to d i scuss the ges tu res o f a rch i t e c tu ra l mas te r p i e ces .

i . Osca r N iemeye rJusce l i n o Kub i t schek B r idge , B ras i l i a , B raz i l i i . A l f onso Edua rdo Re idy , Museum o f Mode rn A r t , R i o de Jane i r o , B raz i l i i i . L i n o Bo Ba rd i , MASP, Sao Pau l o , B raz i li v . Pau l o Mendes da Rocha Museum o f Scu lp tu re , MUBE , Sao Pau l o , B raz i l v . C l o r i ndo Tes ta , Cen t ro Cu l tu ra l Reco le ta , Bueno s A i res , A rgen t i na

S T U D I O 5 5 5 CThe Oberser ver and The Obser ved:

Trave l sketches through South Amer icaFa l l 2009


ii.

iv.

iii.

v.

28

R E N D E R I N G S

ii.

i.

29

The fo l l ow ing images a re a co l l e c t i on o f a rch i t e c-tu ra l i l l us t r a t i ons used be fo re , du r ing and a f t e r the des ign p ro cess fo r pa r t i cu l a r commerc ia l and res i -den t i a l p ro je c t s .

i . Mohonk Moun ta in House , i n te r i o r r enova t i on , co l -o red penc i l + marke ri i . Moun ta in ’ s Edge Res idences , ex te r i o r pe rspec t i ve rende r ing p ro cess d raw ings , i nk on t r a cei i i . D ipp ik i l l Co t t age , ex te r i o r pe rspec t i ve , penc i l i v . D ipp ik i l l Co t t age , i n te r i o r pe rspec t i ve , penc i lv . D ipp ik i l l Co t t age , ex te r i o r r ende r ing , co l o red penc i l + marke r v i . NYRA V iew ing Stand , t r a cks ide , r ev i t mode l r ende r ing v i i . NYRA V iew ing Stand , en t rance , r ev i t mode l r ende r ing v i i i . Mohonk Moun ta in House Po r te Coche re , en-t r ance , r ev i t mode l r ende r ing i x . Ho te l Squa re , Ae r i a l 3D rende r ing

A R C H I T E C T U R A L I L L U S T R A T I O N SSpr ing 2010 - Fa l l 2012

PD G


ii.

3 0


iii.

iv.

31


v.

32

S K E T C H E S + R E N D E R I N G S33

vi. vii.

S K E T C H E S + R E N D E R I N G S34

viii. ix.

nicole andersson architecture portfolio

Documents